[04:31:26] I'm about to fix a good faith likely mistaken edit on mediawiki.org but would like to use the opportunity to learn a Translate extension behavior. In this page, some content was removed from the English version, but is present in translations and for all I can tell on Translate pages the content should still be there. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Help [04:32:56] See the Spanish version for a good example of text the English version no longer has. But in the "translate this page" etc functions the content still shows. [04:34:11] (Yes I'm a complete noob to this extension.) [04:38:23] Any hint as to why the translate views don't show any indication that most of the page content in the source page was deleted? [04:46:02] Oh there's a whole tutorial! :) https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Extension:Translate/Page_translation_example [04:47:01] The discrepancy I'm seeing is likely due to the updated page not having been marked for translation (and rightly so). [04:48:42] djr013: yeah, it wasn't marked for translation [07:43:10] Hi everyone [07:44:02] hi Mah_3110 [12:08:46] Anyone know how to edit the top right links color on mediawiki vector.css (ie. the not loggedin, talk, contributions, etc)... It seems like a div a is overwriting the css I placed in MediaWiki:Vector.css [12:19:57] mpcopatel: whatever you define in your CSS for
  • elements inside of the #p-personal ID, I'd say [12:21:54] thanks andre, sorted it out1 [15:28:03] RoanKattouw: hey, please let me know if you have some time [15:29:18] Amir1: what's up [15:29:50] RoanKattouw: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/430943/ I'm taking over to get change_tag thing done [15:30:14] it would be great if you help on reviewing patches (for the next months) [15:30:55] Yay [15:31:00] Yeah I can review that [15:31:31] Thanks for taking over, I'll review, probably tomorrow [15:31:46] I pushed and we officially added it to the Ministry of magic team (one of wikidata teams, I proposed the name if you want to ask why) [15:32:31] RoanKattouw: thank you, one thing is that the branch cut is later today, I can backport it as well. I guess that doesn't matter much [15:32:53] Doesn't need backporting [15:32:59] No code changes that use it [15:33:14] And dbas don't need it in a specific branch to use the sql file [15:33:43] Good to know [15:34:03] Usually why they request a link to the patch, or hte SQL putting on the task to "create the tables [15:34:04] " [15:34:22] And as that's createing a new table... It doesn't actually need DBAs to do it [15:35:12] oh cool [15:35:19] in that case, it's okay I think