[00:44:09] Hello, I please need help [00:44:39] hi Marcelle [00:45:13] Earlier today I accidentally created a page on wikimedia instead of on the site I should have, is there a way to retrieve this page so I can use the information I added to it [00:45:42] I hit publish page but it looks like the page I created is not on the wikimedia site [00:46:07] Marcelle, can you link to where the article was? [00:46:12] (on wikimedia) [00:47:00] the most likely answer is you'll need to ask the admin who deleted it (or maybe another local admin) very nicely to get a copy of the deleted text [00:47:31] how would i do that? [00:47:40] depends [00:47:49] do you have the link? [00:48:12] I'm not sure if I have the link, can I talk you through what I did instead? [00:48:35] do you at least know what site it was on? [00:49:46] it was on mediawiki.org [00:50:15] https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Couette_flow&action=edit&redlink=1 [00:50:18] okay well at least on that site I am an admin [00:50:19] I think this is the link [00:50:40] Ok great :) [00:50:48] Do you think you could help me? [00:50:59] 19:38, 24 November 2019 Clump talk contribs block deleted page Couette Flow (Out of project scope) (view/restore) (thank) [00:51:36] It was Couette Flow yeah [00:52:21] It was just a project scope deletion I should just be able to send you this [00:53:18] do you need an email to send it to me? [00:53:57] no, see PM [00:54:23] I'm sorry I don't know what PM means [00:54:37] oh wait private message [00:54:58] hm, Kiwi IRC [00:55:00] try /query Krenair [00:55:26] Thank you so much [00:55:49] Do you know if I can copy and paste that into the correct website as is? [00:56:19] that would depend on the rules of the website [00:56:53] it's referencing images [00:57:09] in this case, those appear to be stored on commons, so if the wiki has InstantCommons you should be fine [00:57:35] THANK YOU [00:57:51] You are an amazing person and I hope you have a great day! [00:58:19] otherwise you can probably just reupload the images, possibly depending on licensing rules [00:58:24] you're welcome, you too [04:00:31] why would mediawiki send this on a page move? {"message": "Cannot send an empty message", "code": 50006} [04:00:39] the move succeeds [10:13:14] hi everyone [10:13:35] I'm here to ask if some of you could help me about some tecnichal aspect of mediawiki [10:34:21] TESTER12: Please ask, and we will see [10:36:29] I'm trying to check the owasp requisites of media wiki version 1.27 about architecture. I'd like to kwnow where i can find info about the secure software lifecycle development and all the auth info about the architecture used [11:53:56] hm. seems that in #mediawiki-i18n only the bots are alive [18:06:02] Hi guys, I'm new and couldn't find a good answer. For example if I have a div.smwb-datasheet with "margin-right: 1em;" and I want to set it to "margin-right: 0;. What is the best way todo it? At the moment I say in the css-file "div.datasheet {margin-right: 0;}". But I don't think it's the best way todo it, because the css gets longer and longer. [18:06:02] Is there a better way of doing it? [19:45:29] Hi - I'm trying to merge this patch in to the Approved Revs extension: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/mediawiki/extensions/ApprovedRevs/+/552813/ [19:45:47] ...and keep getting this failure output from Jenkins: https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/quibble-vendor-mysql-php72-docker/31361/console [19:47:02] Can anyone explain this error reporting? It keeps saying "ensure "done()" is called", but I have no idea what that means in this context. Approved Revs contains no JavaScript code. [19:47:27] Is Jenkins just having problems right now? [20:08:28] Yaron: seems that your selenium has JavaScript [20:08:39] That's certainly possible. [20:09:26] the tests are written with js? [20:09:37] e2e tests [20:10:15] I don't think Approved Revs directly contains any tests (I'm not proud of that). [20:12:42] Yaron: MW has selenium E2E tests. [20:13:12] Right. [20:13:34] Core's tests run for all extensions. [20:13:57] So, what can I do? Do these point to some actual problem with the Approved Revs code? [20:14:01] Yaron: found this: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T224546 [20:14:08] Probably, yes. [20:14:31] In a meeting now, will look in a bit. [20:15:03] harmaahylje: I doubt it's this exact thing - it seems to have been resolved in May. [20:15:24] James_F: okay, great. [20:18:38] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T218558#5223836 [20:20:33] harmaahylje: was that intended for me? If so, what does it mean? [20:51:11] Just a link from the previous link [20:51:22] Directed to you Yaron [21:43:34] James_F: I won't be on this channel for much longer today, but I'll check the logs, so if you figure out the issue, please just write it here. [22:08:44] Oh, sorry Yaron (via the logs ;-)). AFAICT it's unhappy with the rollback test because of the changes that the extension makes (and not specific to that change). I'll force merge that one for now. I think you should file a Phabricator task; Zeljko will likely have some idea of how to fix this.