[00:00:08] if you mean hiding them from RC entirely while still making them viewable on Special:Log, I don't believe there is a way to do that without an extension [00:01:32] Skizzerz, I don't mean it should not be visible to any users. But where pages are nuked, and I want to specifically not see the deleted pages in RC for just one moment in time, is there a way to do that? [00:02:41] acagastya: one of the RC filters (up top) is "Logged actions". Removing that filter will remove the display of logs in RC for you [00:02:57] hopefully that's what you're after :) [00:03:05] unfortunately it's all logs, not just deletion logs [00:03:29] Yeah, that is somewhat I am after. But choosing individual logs would be better. [00:03:49] Any plans (that you know of) which would add the feature of selecting individual logs? [00:03:59] I don't know of any, but it's something you could make a Gadget for [00:04:21] * acagastya does not know how to make a gadget. [00:05:06] if it's specifically your *own* deletions you can instead use the "Changes by others" filter [00:05:45] No, not just me. [00:06:41] Reason why hiding all logged actions will hurt is because I will otherwise miss the local file uploads. [00:08:55] the gadget would need to add the css: .mw-changeslist-log-delete { display: none; } [00:09:01] if you end up making one [00:10:05] * Skizzerz has to head off, but someone else can probably help further if you stick around (including helping you make a gadget if that's the route you go down) [00:11:12] Ok, that. Well, I created a hack. [00:11:55] A toggle button: https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/User:Acagastya/hideDelLog.js [00:11:55] And adding the css class: https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/User:Acagastya/tagDelLog.js [00:12:01] Not the best way to do it. [00:12:16] But I wish there was a native way of doing it. [00:17:08] li[data-mw-logaction="delete/delete"] { display: none } [00:25:12] Thanks, chippy. [02:50:05] When I was searching for the keyword "Mercury" on the project, I found a bunch of pages which had the word "Mercury TV" (which showed up in the search result). [02:51:28] Is there a way to specify in the search not to list those? [02:52:26] Advanced search breaks it into "Mercury" and "TV" which is not helpful. [10:01:47] use ! or - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:CirrusSearch#Words,_phrases,_and_modifiers [12:44:46] Hi folks - is there something like Feedcontributions but for JSON in the APIs somewhere? I've tried using a query with prop=revisions and generator=recentchanges with grcgeneraterevisions as true, but that seems to show them in the order of the latest revision of the page, not in the order of the user's contribs. [12:48:10] Isn't that prop=revisions filtering by user? [12:48:44] Vulpix, prop=revisions filtered by user required a specific pageid or pagename I thought? [12:49:21] at least, when I'm running it without a generator, it returns nothing [12:49:53] you can filter by user or by page, or by both [12:50:20] Let me check again [12:51:03] Ah, no, it would be list=allrevisions - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Allrevisions [12:51:06] with just prop=revisions? that goes slightly contrary to my understanding of how the API works if that's right, I was under the impression you needed to have a list or a generator as a source for whatever the prop happens to be doing [12:51:15] Ah yeah that makes more sense [12:51:23] Cheers, let me look at that [12:53:53] That looks like it probably does what I'm after, thanks v much Vulpix! [12:54:01] yw :) [13:00:04] hrm, another potential question - this one might be a bit more difficult. If I want to get pages that have a template embedded, that's nice and easy, I can just use the embeddedin generator - but what if I want to get the latest revision by a particular user on pages that have a template embedded in them? [13:00:16] I get the feeling this might be pushing the limit a bit on what I can do in a single API call though [13:00:39] rvuser can only be used on a single page apparently [16:24:59] Hey - Took over a small wiki semi recently and I'm struggling to update it from 1.26.4 to a fairly current version. Tried to update to 1.27.7 and it renders the site blank. Any help would be smashing, fairly incompetent at this though [16:34:50] ffc: the upgrading manual covers pretty much all what you need: check system requirements, the possibility to upgrade directly to a new version without applying intermediate updates, upgrading extensions too... [16:34:52] !upgrade [16:34:53] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Upgrading [16:35:43] If even checking this you get blank page, try [16:35:45] !blank [16:35:45] A blank page or HTTP 500 error usually indicates a fatal PHP error. For information on debugging (including viewing errors), see . [16:38:32] Grand, I'll roll back and try to update to 1.27.1. Thank you for the links! [16:39:06] considering using native lazy loading for my mediawiki installation, but not sure where to start since I'd need to have it output tags with the loading="lazy" attribute, do I poke the skins (Vector and Minerva)? [16:39:35] wish there was a CSS property for this [16:52:41] oh wait [16:53:01] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgNativeImageLazyLoading this exists, hallelujah [16:54:29] and works fine [16:54:36] ffc: I think you didn't understood me :) You can upgrade directly to 1.34.1. There's no point in upgrading to 1.27.1 since it's outdated and has bugs and security issues [17:02:34] Hi - I'm still waiting to get Jenkins monitoring added to my new extension: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T252473 [17:02:58] Someone before said that I actually do this myself, but I forgot how. Can anyone tell me how? [17:04:05] You can propose the patch, but obviously can't merge deploy [17:05:20] I dunno if CI merges are blocked atm [17:12:09] Well, okay - if I can create the patch, that would at least be a step forward. [17:12:23] integration/config repo [17:12:57] Is there some temporary block on changes, though? [17:13:52] I'm not 100% sure what's going on [17:14:02] There was a CI upgade earlier in the week that was rolled back [17:14:19] I tried to deploy another change a few days ago and got caught up with some fallout of that upgrade [17:15:53] James_F: ^ Are CI deploys still blocked/advised against? [17:18:29] Oh, no, I can do it. [17:22:09] Yaron: Done. [17:28:52] James_F: thank you! [17:36:30] James_F: since we're already talking - I generally approve my own changes on my extensions, for better or worse. But I promised not to do that for the Replace Text extension, now that it's bundled in with MediaWiki. But unfortunately, no one else seems to be approving my Replace Text modifications now. [17:36:42] Well, approving or at least reviewing. [17:36:43] Yaron: Who did you ask? [17:36:51] No one. [17:36:58] lol [17:37:07] … [17:37:10] Is that bad? :) [17:37:23] My psychic powers are formidable, but even I have limits. ;-) [17:37:49] I just figured that there was some "select group" of extensions whose changes got reviewed by the right people, like patches to core MediaWiki do. [17:38:02] You know, the inner council or what have you. [17:38:32] I suspect you can find maaany mw core patches that aren't being reviewed either [17:38:47] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/ReplaceText/+/593516 looks fine, but I don't generally do pg stuff. [17:38:56] OTOH, Reedy is a pg expert. ;-) [17:39:20] So what's the best way to ask people to review a patch? [17:39:28] Should I create a Phabricator task for each one? [17:39:38] Just add me as a reviewer in gerrit. [17:40:56] I should probably know this already, but... how do I do that? [17:42:22] Never mind, I found it. [17:43:18] Reedy: I just added you as a reviewer for that patch. [17:43:50] And James_F: I have a few more Replace Text patches waiting; I'll add you as a reviewer to those. [17:45:03] Sure. [17:54:37] Vulpix - sorry about that, poor habit of skim reading, I'll give it a spin now! [17:54:41] Thank you again [19:55:45] hi [19:56:09] how can i improve my website [19:56:21] advanced writing [20:16:18] Hi ubuntutr - This is a chat regarding wikipedia. Are you referring to a wikipedia account or something else? [20:32:14] hi [20:32:22] hi [20:33:46] Galendalia: https://zekirdek.org/sozluk/index.php?title=Anasayfa [20:34:31] I want to build a vocabulary [20:34:47] can I use mediawiki ? [20:35:43] if you want [20:37:46] is it suitable for words ? [20:38:00] also now not responsive [20:38:17] can i fix it ? [20:38:26] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bemused [20:38:56] https://en.wiktionary.org [20:39:09] is it the same ? [20:39:16] like this mediawiki? [20:39:31] yes, it's the same software [20:39:38] mh [20:40:46] https://m.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Version [20:48:03] how can i install plugins [20:50:03] !extensions [20:50:03] MediaWiki has been built so it can easily be customized by adding extensions. This is usually a simple process. See http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Extensions for instructions to install extensions, as well as for writing them. See http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_Matrix for an overview of known extensions. [23:58:17] I think codesearch/global is returning results quicker than git-grep on my local host for just a single repo [23:59:07] See also 1980s and the prediction to return to thin clients without OS or disks. "Its' faster to get it off the network"