[17:56:43] <Krinkle>	 Amir1: is the hardcoded integer here the "right" way to use abstract schema changes? Is this something we control or pass-through from an upstream library? might be nicer if this were something like "int32" or some such. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/core/+/666780/4/maintenance/abstractSchemaChanges/patch-objectcache-modtime-token.json
[17:57:38] <Krinkle>	 I wonder what happens if it is off by one in the current way
[17:58:01] <Krinkle>	 will it fails as being likely unintended/unexpected, or will it do something very similar, or something very different
[17:58:10] <Amir1>	 Krinkle: good point. I think it can get hard-coded, it's not that hard to implement 
[17:58:16] <Amir1>	 Can you file a bug for it?
[17:58:21] <Krinkle>	 sure
[17:58:58] <Krinkle>	 do you know w.r.t. what will happen if it's e.g. a few higher or lower, is the current number magic mapped to specific things, or would it not behave significantly differently if the number were something arbitrary
[18:08:32] <Krinkle>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T276133
[18:22:48] <Yaron>	 Hi - is Jenkins very slow and/or down right now?
[18:24:31] <legoktm>	 ...just slow.
[18:52:43] <Yaron>	 legoktm: okay, thanks.
[18:58:22] <legoktm>	 Yaron: for future reference, https://integration.wikimedia.org/zuul/ shows how backlogged zuul is
[23:30:33] <Yaron>	 legoktm: sorry, I only saw this now - that's a helpful link, thank you!