[02:32:21] <mugli>	 Greetings,
[02:32:21] <mugli>	 Import from flickr or other big-tech photo sharing platforms is permitted if the source licence is compatible with BY-CC-SA 3.0 or 4.0.
[02:32:22] <mugli>	 Is this tha case for personal blogs for infographics or illustrations?
[02:32:22] <mugli>	 Well regards,
[02:32:23] <mugli>	 mugli
[02:32:57] <mugli>	 Sorry, wrong room.
[02:33:04] <mugli>	 :(  :)
[02:33:32] <Shaun>	 (a very general answer would be that the license is usually more important than the source)
[02:37:04] <mugli>	 Thank You @Shaun for your swift answer!
[02:37:30] <mugli>	 🤝
[07:11:14] <kaste>	 $wgInvalidUsernameCharacters = ''; 
[07:11:42] <kaste>	 I am trying to allow @ as a character in the usernames, however even with that line it complains about using @ in a username when creating a new user
[07:11:49] <kaste>	 Is that the wrong way to do it?
[07:13:20] <kaste>	 ah nvm
[17:04:53] <absorto>	 Hi, can someone point me as to how safely do dbw transactions in an extension? I've tried with doAtomic but I'm still having issues with corruption :/
[17:06:25] <Reedy>	 You might want to pastebin your code or link :)
[17:10:23] <absorto>	 nice, just a sec
[17:12:08] <absorto>	 here: https://share.riseup.net/#a6dvMiTWX10hSRCkavX1vw
[17:13:13] <Reedy>	 fwiw, you can do an IN by just doing [ 'colname' => $arrayOfItems ]
[17:15:02] <absorto>	 cool, didn't know that
[17:16:00] <Reedy>	 underneath it'll do an = if it's singular, IN if it's multiple
[17:20:43] <absorto>	 Ah, I forgot to say that this an extension developed as a SpecialPage.
[17:20:48] <Reedy>	 So what do you mean by corruption?
[17:22:00] <absorto>	 It deletes the old revisions as expected, but some of the pages, dozens of them, throw an Exception when I try to read them
[17:22:36] <absorto>	 the exception is: MediaWiki\Revision\RevisionAccessException
[17:24:00] <Reedy>	 Whats the error message etc?
[17:26:02] <absorto>	 I get: Fatal Exception of type "MediaWiki\Revision\RevisionAccessException"
[17:26:33] <absorto>	 and on the logs I can see "Failed to load data blob from tt:1010: Unable to fetch blob at tt:1010" in the trace
[17:30:32] <Reedy>	 So I'd imagine that means there's nothing wrong with the transaction specifically, but you're not cleaning up everything you might need to
[17:31:55] <absorto>	 So the use of startAtomic/endAtomic pairs is correct? 
[17:33:04] <absorto>	 this extension was using begin()/commit() first, but from what I understood from the docs, that is not safe for inner tx, right?
[17:37:25] <legoktm>	 it looks correct to me
[17:38:49] <absorto>	 nice! thanks Reedy and legoktm 
[17:39:31] <absorto>	 I go after this bug in other places then. 
[17:41:08] <absorto>	 other places in the code, I mean :-)