[20:43:00] <YuviPanda>	 ok then
[20:43:02] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 I am trusted? :D
[20:43:05] <halfak>	 YuviPanda, gotcha.
[20:43:15] <halfak>	 OK.  We still want the USB off change I made.
[20:43:21] <halfak>	 ToAruShiroiNeko, no!
[20:43:23] <halfak>	 :P
[20:43:28] <YuviPanda>	 halfak: http://bots.wmflabs.org/~wm-bot/logs/%23wikimedia-ai/
[20:43:34] <YuviPanda>	 halfak: yeah. but now rebase
[20:43:49] <halfak>	 Helder, can you look at https://github.com/wiki-ai/revscoring/pull/143 again?
[20:44:09] <halfak>	 YuviPanda, will do.
[20:44:54] <Helder>	 that looks good to go halfak
[20:45:05] <Helder>	 halfak, did you notice https://github.com/wiki-ai/wikilabels/issues/68 ?
[20:45:13] <halfak>	 YuviPanda, should we merge https://github.com/wiki-ai/ores/pull/74 first?
[20:45:30] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 can it simply message and not notice? :/
[20:45:37] <YuviPanda>	 halfak: yes
[20:45:45] <Helder>	 {{merged}}
[20:45:53] <halfak>	 Helder, campaign isn't done.  It turns out that we have double-labels for some tasks due to our auto-labeling.
[20:46:15] <Helder>	 cool! we have moar bots on this channel!
[20:46:18] <halfak>	 Helder, see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Revision_scoring_as_a_service/Work_log/2015-07-22
[20:46:25] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 yes one bot a day keeps the doctor away
[20:46:39] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 bots distract doctors
[20:47:10] <halfak>	 It looks like ptwiki will need to go 285+20000 labels to get all the tasks labeled.
[20:48:01] <YuviPanda>	 halfak: we need to migrate wikilabels to the new setup at some point
[20:48:02] <halfak>	 Helder, we need to add a 'labeled_tasks' field to the stats
[20:48:07] <halfak>	 YuviPanda, +1
[20:48:11] <YuviPanda>	 halfak: ideally I'd be 100% uninvolved in that and it'll be all madhuvishy and you
[20:48:19] <halfak>	 OK.
[20:48:25] <awight>	 !log set up GitHub notifications for all wiki-ai repos
[20:48:34] <halfak>	 I'm due for some work on wikilabels to clean up some of the mess we made at wikimania
[20:48:36] <YuviPanda>	 halfak: not because I want to be uninvolved, but just so that we diversify our investments :)
[20:48:46] <halfak>	 +1 good plan YuviPanda
[20:48:51] <halfak>	 You better not be leaving me.
[20:48:52] <halfak>	 ;)
[20:49:02] <YuviPanda>	 hehe :D
[20:49:04] <YuviPanda>	 don't worry
[20:52:44] <madhuvishy>	 hi hi sup
[20:52:51] <Helder>	 can/should this bot also post on IRC when someone comments somewhere?
[20:53:23] <Helder>	 e.g. our main (talk) pages, and maybe GitHub/Phabricator issues
[20:53:54] <halfak>	 Seems like a fine idea to me.
[20:54:07] <awight>	 I don't know if there's integration available for GH comments, but Phabricator is easy, the configuration is in https://git.wikimedia.org/git/labs/tools/wikibugs2.git
[20:54:29] <halfak>	 Let's not go too far with logging all the things in the channel though.
[20:54:49] <halfak>	 awight, re. https://github.com/wiki-ai/revscoring/pull/141
[20:54:52] <awight>	 People will begin to suspect we have bots writing bots
[20:55:09] <awight>	 yes
[20:55:14] <halfak>	 Do you want to do the language codes as module names or are you thinking of moving towards Language.get("lang code")?
[20:55:44] <awight>	 I commented here, https://github.com/wiki-ai/revscoring/issues/138
[20:56:06] <halfak>	 Oh yeah.  I saw that.
[20:56:13] <awight>	 I'm perfectly happy with all the good stuff happing in PR#141, just looking at future improvements
[20:56:24] <halfak>	 Makes sense.  :)
[20:56:29] <awight>	 I did notice that we have a ton of repetition whenever multiple languages are involved
[20:56:35] <awight>	 The Makefile, for example...
[20:56:49] <Helder>	 me too
[20:56:57] <awight>	 The actual languages/LANGNAME.py modules are fragile too, cos of that repeated code you were mentioning
[20:57:39] <awight>	 We certainly don't have to get declarative if you don't want to, I did see that there's some yamlconfig stuff happening in ores that should be in scope if we ever do decide to clean that stuff up.
[20:57:57] <halfak>	 Yeah.  I'd be down for blocking the pull request until we can get a Regex/Enchant base class implemented.
[20:58:15] <awight>	 I don't care about language.get('en') on a personal level, so you should ignore me.  It's more that I recognize this as an unsustainable pattern.
[20:58:30] <halfak>	 Indeed.
[20:58:36] <awight>	 It should be *really* easy to create new languages, should not require messing around in more than one place.
[20:58:54] <halfak>	 Agreed.
[20:59:15] <awight>	 A declarative file is a natural fit mostly because it can be read by multiple utilities without having to coordinate the data structures and (programming) languages
[20:59:35] <awight>	 I don't want to block your PR, in fact would like to see it merged before any more work happens in that area...
[20:59:49] <awight>	 It certainly doesn't make anything worse, all a good idea.
[20:59:55] <halfak>	 OK.  Let's do that.
[21:00:04] <halfak>	 I'll keep the generalized language class on the backburner.
[21:00:11] <halfak>	 And run off to my next meeting
[21:00:12] <halfak>	 o/
[21:00:17] * halfak runs off to next meeting
[21:00:21] <awight>	 Unfortunate that you needed module magick, we can clean that up later though
[21:00:24] <awight>	 kbye!
[21:01:47] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 Aaron in a meeting? Did that surprise anyone? :D
[21:08:28] <Helder>	 halfak, what is "labels" in https://labels.wmflabs.org/campaigns/ptwiki/?campaigns=stats ?
[21:08:43] <Helder>	 Isn't it the number of labels already submitted by users?
[21:08:52] <halfak>	 Includes auto-labels
[21:09:03] <halfak>	 In some cases, we auto-labeled things that already had a human label too
[21:09:10] <halfak>	 So some tasks have two labels!
[21:09:53] <Helder>	 but 20290 is already greater than the predicted 285+20000
[21:11:08] <Helder>	 halfak, ^
[21:55:56] <Bmir1>	 https://labels.wmflabs.org/campaigns/fawiki/?campaigns=stats
[21:56:06] <Bmir1>	 halfak: and ToAruShiroiNeko
[21:56:13] <Bmir1>	 ToAruShiroiNeko: Simple is ready
[21:56:16] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 Yes
[21:56:20] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 I saw
[21:56:21] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 thanks :)
[21:56:26] <Bmir1>	 working on Dutch I hope you won't need it
[21:56:43] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 its non urgent but sure it can wait
[21:56:50] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 this time I am talking to community first
[21:56:54] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 italian is of interest too
[21:57:03] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 because belissimo.
[21:58:12] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 let me pull the phabricator entry
[21:58:32] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T106861
[21:58:40] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Revision_scoring_as_a_service/Work_log/2015-07-22
[21:59:07] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 fawiki has to go 261
[21:59:09] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 extra
[21:59:24] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 ptwiki only 4 so it should be done really
[23:12:20] <halfak>	 Helder, indeed it is.  looking into it.
[23:23:26] <halfak>	 Helder, I just requested and received the last 4 tasks in ptwiki :)
[23:23:36] <halfak>	 So, nothing seems to be broken.
[23:25:09] <halfak>	 OK.  Done!
[23:25:23] <halfak>	 Now I'll want to have you review the tasks I did with google translate to see if I did OK. :)
[23:25:31] <halfak>	 Also, mad props for getting ptwiki done!
[23:25:33] <halfak>	 WOOO!
[23:48:07] <Helder>	 how can I review them, halfak ?
[23:51:38] <Helder>	 by any chance are they the ones which appear in my last workset? (coincidentally there are 4 tasks to finish it)
[23:56:26] <Helder>	 it seems they were the last ones.
[23:56:28] <Helder>	 I got "conflict: No tasks available for user_id=8303885 in campaign_id=7"
[23:56:44] <Helder>	 halfak, is this the expected behavior for finishing a campaign?