[02:53:50] Happy New Years everyone. Anyone on? [02:54:46] Question: What's the quickest way to look up a revision from a revision *number*? [02:55:10] halfak answered the inverse of this yesterday, but this is my new noob question of the day. [09:35:28] aetilley try: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/?oldid= [09:35:36] where = would equal to your rev id [09:35:44] oh he left already [11:58:27] welcome to 2016 my USian counterparts :p [11:58:38] As always you are late to the game. :p [15:07:54] hello amir [15:21:43] Amir1 do you remember the water vandalism anomaly ? [15:21:55] do you remember where the report was posted? [15:22:10] Hey ToAruShiroiNeko Happy new year [15:22:12] yes [15:22:26] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:ORES/Report_mistakes [15:22:29] can you link me? [15:22:33] (Search for "water") [15:23:01] -_- [15:23:57] so its a one line report? [15:25:16] the PR16 mentioned is which repo? [15:25:50] Amir1 btw thank you for the new year wishes :) [15:26:02] Sorry I was spaced out there briefly [15:26:38] PR #16 in wb-vandalism :) [15:26:48] it's okay :) [15:26:57] I wish you a happy, prosperous and healthy new year as well [15:27:03] but there is a task in phab too [15:27:34] thanks :) you too [15:27:47] so https://github.com/wiki-ai/wb-vandalism/pull/16 [15:27:58] yes but phab task didnt mention the pull request or report [15:28:01] I will add those there [15:28:50] We ran some numbers with Aaron the other night. It turned out we can reduce number of human edits to be reviewed to 1% [15:29:19] and catch all vandalism edits [15:29:45] wait a sec [15:29:46] yeah I did read that [15:29:59] that's not right [15:30:01] but does that not run into the risk of bias? [15:30:59] it has some bias towards users [15:31:01] but not much [15:31:13] the correct number is PR 17 [15:31:15] not 16 [15:31:17] sorry my bad [15:31:26] https://github.com/wiki-ai/wb-vandalism/pull/17 [15:31:47] We actually made these improvements in several steps [15:31:53] this one was the first one [15:32:36] my report ends on 12 dec so any progress would be handled in its own card :D [15:34:00] okay :) [16:11:04] well reports posted [16:11:09] that did not have a done card :/ [17:18:07] o/ [17:18:18] Can anyone think of how to open the data files in this repo? [17:18:20] https://github.com/odashi/ckylark/tree/master/data [17:18:42] When I unzip them the become execs, and I'm not sure if that's by design. [17:18:48] [2016-01-01, 03:54:49] Question: What's the quickest way to look up a revision from a revision *number*? [17:18:58] [2016-01-01, 10:35:31] <+ToAruShiroiNeko> aetilley try: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/?oldid= [17:19:12] = followed by the revid [17:19:12] 04Error: Command “followed” not recognized. Please review and correct what you’ve written. [17:19:54] ToAruShiroiNeko: Hey that's great! [17:20:10] AsimovBot do not make me overload my aggressuin inhibitors [17:20:50] incidentally https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/?oldid=12345 is the logo discussion. :D [17:21:59] aetilley, [17:22:04] those files are regular gzip [17:22:28] uh, hold on... [17:22:35] http://dpaste.com/09NE20N [17:22:37] ^ [17:25:17] zcat huh? [17:25:54] "zcat" == "gunzip -c" [17:30:50] ready? [17:31:02] This is strange. It's telling me "no such file" [17:31:07] * ToAruShiroiNeko pokes halfak [17:31:18] I'll come back to this I guess. [17:33:14] Amir1, we can't hear you [17:33:20] Unmute your mic [18:27:49] TarLocesilion hello [21:06:10] o/ halfak [21:07:06] please ping me when you're around [22:21:40] hi, ToAruShiroiNeko. (sorry for my lag :) [23:26:17] o/ [23:26:20] Amir1, [23:26:29] hey :) [23:26:37] halfak: have you seen my email? [23:26:59] Re. refactoring, yes. [23:27:51] ok [23:27:56] Aha! I can make this much more simple. Sorry for the confusion. [23:28:15] You don't need to instantiate Revision at all. [23:28:24] * halfak works on wikidata.py [23:28:24] awesome [23:28:30] oh! I should look at the blog too. [23:28:39] let's finish the blog and continue afterwards [23:28:43] kk [23:28:47] it's simple to finish [23:28:53] there are two comments [23:29:03] 1- Lydia suggests we delete something [23:29:13] It's okay for me, but depends on you [23:29:18] (you wrote that) [23:29:30] 2- she says we should add screen shots [23:30:04] I don't know which screen shot is more suitable, the one with recent changes or what you put in the main blog post? [23:30:12] halfak: ^ [23:30:18] We'll want a wiki-data diff example [23:30:59] E.g. you could screenshot the edits you reference in the text. [23:31:17] Re. deleting, I'm OK with that too. [23:32:22] halfak: I just screenshot a diff? [23:32:30] Yup. [23:32:34] what about ores, etc [23:32:35] Make sure you get it high res. [23:33:09] You'll want to zoom in to get large text before the screen shot. [23:33:35] ok :) [23:34:41] I'm considering if we should pull in the support table [23:39:19] halfak: at first I thought I should screenshot from a diff in wikidata [23:39:27] https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q7251&diff=267233560&oldid=264499117 [23:39:47] Looks good to me [23:40:36] but you want a screenshot from ores server, don't you? [23:40:43] We need to make ScoredRevisions an official gadget [23:40:48] We want both [23:40:51] https://ores.wmflabs.org/scores/wikidatawiki/reverted/267233560/ [23:41:14] kk [23:41:21] E.g. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/11/30/artificial-intelligence-x-ray-specs/ [23:48:48] halfak: can you check the screenshots? [23:49:57] I think we should have a screenshot for good edits too. [23:50:25] okay :) [23:54:54] I just finished a pass. I think it's good to go as soon as it has the screenshots. [23:55:32] great