[16:56:11] o/ [16:56:14] hey ToAruShiroiNeko [16:57:06] I'm just about to head up to my first meeting today. If you can't make the sync session, that's OK. Could you summarize your updates in an email to the group? [16:57:21] It would nice to sync up tomorrow for the hack session too if you can make it. [16:57:36] * halfak gets in elevator so connection will probably drop [16:57:40] o/ aetilley [16:57:47] heya [16:58:30] I'm just about to drop offline, but wanted to say hey. [16:58:34] I'll connect to the meeting later :) [16:59:02] ok [20:00:09] So does the "Fullscreen" button on the WL gadget work for anyone? [20:04:02] Also, should the infobox next to "Damaging Yes No" really say "Would you revert this edit?" [20:04:13] halfak: ^ [20:04:17] Amir1: ^ [20:04:20] ToAruShiroiNeko: ^ [20:05:06] hey [20:05:13] I don't think halfak would be around [20:05:19] as he said earlier [20:05:37] no he's around [20:41:17] Amir1: Thank you. [20:41:44] about the question: I think the concept is different [20:42:08] would you consider this edit damaging is different with would you revert it [20:42:17] e.g. I go and fix the edit [20:47:59] Amir1: Agreed [20:48:23] I just finished reading these meeting notes. [20:50:10] Perhaps before a user starts a new WL workset, he should be asked to point to one of these which represtends their mood that day: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/0f/3f/61/0f3f61fb40d7ccfe1237973eb7475f18.jpg [20:50:13] Amir1: ^ [20:50:45] (jk) [21:15:35] Amir1: Also it's not clear whether the "Not Sure" bit refers to "Damaning" or "Good Faith" [21:20:49] that's a good idea to catch bias aetilley