[00:00:17] mediawiki already has this capability, to resize [00:00:21] but on upload? [00:00:33] it doesnt have to be on upload [00:00:39] it could be on use [00:00:48] its not like all fair use files are properly uploaded [00:00:56] somtimes we demote it out of necesity [00:01:10] free image not free due to FOP etc [00:01:29] 06Revision-Scoring-As-A-Service, 10ORES: Split wheels repo into Prod/WMFLabs branches and maintain independence - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154436#2921818 (10Halfak) Nevermind. I abandoned that because it was a patchset against master. I'm trying and failing to submit a patchset against `wmflabs` [00:01:39] 06Revision-Scoring-As-A-Service, 10ORES: Split wheels repo into Prod/WMFLabs branches and maintain independence - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154436#2921819 (10Halfak) [00:01:41] I am more of a fan of an anti commons but I dont know if we have community support for that [00:01:56] a fair-use commons that enforces ridgid rules [00:02:14] hm, okay [00:02:40] english wikipedia has such rules and they are well enforced [00:02:46] what I mean is more like an image can be flagged in software as fair use and that prevents the software from rendering it above a certain resolution, even if it was originally uploaded beyond that [00:02:52] practically every other wiki without a large userbase, it is an after thought [00:03:02] Earwig yes [00:03:19] that would be what I would think would be a good non intrusive solution [00:03:26] comunity would riot with other measures [00:03:46] and you would encourage people to upload it with a fake free license if you resize it on upload [00:10:58] its best to let a simple template tag determine if the file is fairuse or not, we have that template [00:11:15] and mediawiki would resolution lock it to a certain value [00:11:39] exceeding it would display a certain svg with an error mesage [00:13:29] or just scale it [00:13:38] er, depending on context [00:13:40] yes [00:13:48] but I would rather display an error [00:13:57] yeah [00:13:59] easier to code and also informative [00:14:06] "dont do this" [00:14:21] or flag it sliently [00:14:28] with an admin category [00:14:40] so many different ways to keep track of it exists [00:14:50] lit. anything is better than the current method. [00:55:46] Earwig your querry is wrong [00:55:57] I see practically every hit having main namespace edits [00:55:57] I didn't write it [00:56:13] let's see [00:56:15] I have the same problem still :/ [00:56:23] give me a min, I'll look [00:56:29] sure sure [00:56:35] I'll give you 5 :p [00:56:39] no worries :p [02:04:06] (03Abandoned) 10Mooeypoo: [wip] RecentChanges Dynamic Filters [extensions/ORES] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/319251 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T144448) (owner: 10Mooeypoo) [13:15:32] 10Revision-Scoring-As-A-Service-Backlog, 10ORES, 10WikiCon-Francophone-2016: Do a workshop for ORES to create lists for damaging and goodfaith edits on French projects - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T139172#2923317 (10Aklapper) Did this happen at #WikiCon-Francophone-2016? If yes, can you close as resol... [13:18:31] 10Revision-Scoring-As-A-Service-Backlog, 10ORES: Do a workshop for ORES to create lists for damaging and goodfaith edits on French projects - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T139172#2923321 (10Trizek) 05Open>03declined It didn't happen. [16:44:43] o/ Amir1 [16:44:54] I've almost got the ORES repos cleaned up. [16:45:20] But I'm stuck on sending a patchset to the new `wmflabs` branch on the wheels repo. [16:45:25] Was hoping you might have some ideas. [16:46:02] Do you know of any repos with multiple branches actively maintained? I want to make sure that our configs match something that is known to work. [16:46:53] 06Revision-Scoring-As-A-Service, 10ORES: Split wheels repo into Prod/WMFLabs branches and maintain independence - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154436#2923677 (10Halfak) I've had a few conversations in `#wikimedia-dev`. It seems that no one is quite sure why this doesn't work. [16:48:38] akosiaris, hey dude. I wonder if you have any experience with ^ [16:49:29] It looks like puppet has two branches [16:49:29] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/admin/projects/operations/puppet,branches [16:49:44] * halfak heads over to #wikimedia-operations [17:16:20] 06Revision-Scoring-As-A-Service, 10ORES: Split wheels repo into Prod/WMFLabs branches and maintain independence - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154436#2923823 (10Halfak) OK. So git is magic. I've created https://github.com/halfak/ores-deploy-wmflabs-wheels in the short-term so that I can work on gettin... [17:43:23] Alright trying out the code in staging. [17:45:58] Well that failed. It looks like changing the referenced repository caused a relatively serious issue. [17:46:16] fatal: reference is not a tree: aad310f55331b6f0e11ed058943e0048a96b6a05 [18:35:37] hahaha! [18:35:39] Got it [18:35:50] Big thanks to bd808 for working through it with me [19:06:16] 06Revision-Scoring-As-A-Service, 10ORES: Split wheels repo into Prod/WMFLabs branches and maintain independence - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154436#2911361 (10Halfak) [19:06:49] 06Revision-Scoring-As-A-Service, 10ORES: Split wheels repo into Prod/WMFLabs branches and maintain independence - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154436#2911361 (10Halfak) Changes deployed successfully to staging See https://ores-staging.wmflabs.org/ Let's wait for https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T1519... [19:07:07] 06Revision-Scoring-As-A-Service, 10ORES: Split wheels repo into Prod/WMFLabs branches and maintain independence - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154436#2924111 (10Halfak) a:03Halfak [20:46:26] Earwig any progress? [20:46:33] I would love that [20:46:51] on the query? [20:47:53] yeah [20:48:06] I got distracted, I'll look now [20:48:06] I still need users that uploaded files but have no or very few mainspace edits [20:48:17] distractions are fine. I distract myself all the time [20:48:23] woooo a butterfly! :p [20:52:48] Seriously though, I hope to focus on it for quite some time. It would be great if I have the info sooner :) [20:57:31] ToAruShiroiNeko, the query from yesterday wasn't sufficient? [20:57:40] halfak, it's not giving the right results [20:57:48] Ahh. I made a mistake then. [20:57:50] it's returning users with mainspace edits [20:58:02] OK. I can take a quick look now if you're not working on it. [20:58:13] I'm looking, but more eyes would be helpful if you see something obvious [20:58:27] hrm [21:00:53] kk pulling it up now. [21:01:57] I wish there weren't 30M users... :P [21:02:26] actually we might be able to do user_editcount > 0 since an upload counts as an edit [21:02:30] if it does [21:08:17] (03PS1) 10Ladsgroup: Small adjustment in "soft" color to make it more aligned with the color palette [extensions/ORES] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/331003 [21:08:53] Earwig or ToAruShiroiNeko, do you have an example of a user who meets the criteria? [21:09:06] I want to test this out with a single known user. [21:09:56] no idea [21:16:35] kk [21:16:54] I think I have a solution. I'm running a quick test now [21:17:01] https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/15259 [21:17:11] Same performance according to the optimizer. [21:17:26] But uses a HAVING clause to count up namespace zero edits. [21:24:51] We're going to end up taking down the labs DBs :S [21:58:19] halfak sure [21:58:32] no it had too many false positives [21:59:02] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Pradeepika_kln [21:59:30] ToAruShiroiNeko, when this finishes, I think it'll be right: Pradeepika_kln [21:59:30] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Rishiagarwalindia [21:59:31] Woops [21:59:37] https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/15289 [21:59:40] ^ That query [21:59:54] * halfak grabs usernames to run tests with [22:00:18] try those two [22:00:46] also thank you for concat [22:00:50] its a hastle otherwise :) [22:01:08] I know its a few mminutes with the regexes I know [22:04:45] Earwig I wish we had a way of deleting usernames from the table that has zero edits [22:05:27] I know edit count can be used but meh [22:05:54] whats the point of keep track of a million usernames starting with ! and then an insult or some troll gorup name [22:53:11] ToAruShiroiNeko, https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/15289 [22:53:14] Looks like we have results [22:53:19] Want to check 'em with me? [22:53:26] sure [22:54:23] Like this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/PrevinNK [22:55:24] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Julieh75 [22:55:33] yup these are what I want to process so far [22:55:51] Wooot! [22:55:54] Godspeed :) [22:59:00] only 8000+ users [22:59:42] 06Revision-Scoring-As-A-Service, 10Edit-Review-Improvements, 10rsaas-editquality, 06Collaboration-Team-Triage (Collab-Team-Q3-Jan-Mar-2017): Implement new precision-based test stats for editquality models - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151970#2924828 (10Halfak) FYI: PR is here: https://github.com/wik... [23:02:44] halfak there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:%E3%81%A8%E3%81%82%E3%82%8B%E7%99%BD%E3%81%84%E7%8C%AB/sandbox