[05:34:05] PROBLEM - check disk on ORES-web02.Experimental is WARNING: DISK WARNING - free space: / 1080 MB (5% inode=92%); [06:26:06] RECOVERY - check disk on ORES-web02.Experimental is OK: DISK OK [15:03:32] Technical Advice IRC meeting starting in 60 minutes in channel #wikimedia-tech, hosts: @nuria & @Thiemo_WMDE - all questions welcome, more infos: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Advice_IRC_Meeting [15:35:41] o/ [15:48:00] I'm still sick (me and my bf) will work on Saturday and Sunday instead [15:50:30] Gotcha. I hope you feel better soon, man. Sounds rough. [15:51:11] Thanks. We had a weird weather last week [15:53:02] Technical Advice IRC meeting starting in 10 minutes in channel #wikimedia-tech, hosts: @nuria & @Thiemo_WMDE - all questions welcome, more infos: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Advice_IRC_Meeting [16:14:23] 10Scoring-platform-team (Current): Announce WikiLabels migration - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T218230 (10Harej) [17:14:36] halfak: re https://github.com/wikimedia/editquality/pull/181 , you should probably just be able to self merge if this is more a config change than a change to logic [17:15:35] Yeah. I agree. It's a clean change, but it's always good to have feedback on the structure of how I did it. [17:15:53] i understand self-merging isn't ideal but not a lot of people can review (i understand amir finds the change to be daunting) [17:16:19] anyways, go ahead and merge it, undo it if something breaks, and we'll be set [17:16:26] Oh. There's not that much to review. I really just want someone to look at the code -- not the output. [17:17:28] Also, we review model_info outputs every time we do a substantial change to revscoring because we rebuild everything. [17:17:57] So that part is a big, but common workload. I don't think it makes sense to have someone look through the generated Makefile. [17:18:08] They can see what kind of shapes it has by looking at the template file. [17:18:22] Does that make sense? [17:19:22] What is the distinction between the code and output? I'm assuming the output is what is generated by this Makefile template. So we're still talking about a diff that's thousands of lines. [17:20:19] Oh. Just don't look at that one file and it's a lot fewer lines. [17:23:15] The makefile is 1400 lines. The template file is 82. [17:24:01] We're both going to be writing configs that work against this template file, so I want to make sure I didn't make something that isn't going to work or is otherwise annoying to work with. [17:25:52] Anyway, I've got to run. I skipped lunch for travel-meetings and now it is time for dinner. I'll just merge the change if Amir says so, but I think that ought to be his call. [17:29:23] I feel like I should say that this can all certainly wait until he is well. There's no rush. [17:42:42] halAFK: I asked Amir1 about it and he’s okay with you merging. [18:20:29] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/opinion/artificial-intelligence-wikipedia.html [18:20:53] just sharing -- doesn't look like it was announced on any lists [19:13:27] PROBLEM - ORES web node labs ores-web-02 on ores.wmflabs.org is CRITICAL: HTTP CRITICAL: HTTP/1.1 500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR - 3491 bytes in 0.250 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [19:13:35] PROBLEM - ORES web node labs ores-web-01 on ores.wmflabs.org is CRITICAL: HTTP CRITICAL: HTTP/1.1 500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR - 3491 bytes in 0.257 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [19:15:55] RECOVERY - ORES web node labs ores-web-02 on ores.wmflabs.org is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 540 bytes in 0.742 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [19:16:05] RECOVERY - ORES web node labs ores-web-01 on ores.wmflabs.org is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 540 bytes in 3.100 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [20:13:09] PROBLEM - ORES worker labs on ores.wmflabs.org is CRITICAL: HTTP CRITICAL: HTTP/1.1 500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR - 3491 bytes in 0.344 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [20:13:35] PROBLEM - ORES worker production on ores.wikimedia.org is CRITICAL: HTTP CRITICAL: HTTP/1.1 500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR - 4145 bytes in 0.147 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [20:13:45] PROBLEM - ORES web node labs ores-web-02 on ores.wmflabs.org is CRITICAL: HTTP CRITICAL: HTTP/1.1 500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR - 3491 bytes in 0.252 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [20:13:49] PROBLEM - ORES web node labs ores-web-01 on ores.wmflabs.org is CRITICAL: HTTP CRITICAL: HTTP/1.1 500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR - 3491 bytes in 0.271 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [20:14:24] Lots of PROBLEM in -operations [20:15:02] RECOVERY - ORES web node labs ores-web-01 on ores.wmflabs.org is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 540 bytes in 1.351 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [20:16:40] RECOVERY - ORES worker labs on ores.wmflabs.org is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 540 bytes in 0.316 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [20:16:58] RECOVERY - ORES web node labs ores-web-02 on ores.wmflabs.org is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 540 bytes in 0.342 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [20:25:28] RECOVERY - ORES worker production on ores.wikimedia.org is OK: HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 972 bytes in 0.236 second response time https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES [23:47:19] is the articlequality model actually available for wikidata as the support checklist shows? [23:47:58] oh, i see... it's called `itemquality`