[13:17:35] <halfak>	 o/
[18:51:12] <halfak>	 async time!  
[18:51:18] <halfak>	 First kevinbazira: 
[18:51:19] <halfak>	 Y:
[18:51:20] <halfak>	 Reviewed Andy's patchsets
[18:51:20] <halfak>	     584056 (Update jade.api docs)
[18:51:20] <halfak>	     584074 (Update ext.Jade.entityView docs)
[18:51:20] <halfak>	 Proposed snackbar/toast elements as a standard way to show users brief notifications without pushing down content or covering it.
[18:51:22] <halfak>	     Made a POC that is ready to demo
[18:51:24] <halfak>	 T:    
[18:51:26] <halfak>	 Reviewed Andy's patchsets
[18:51:28] <halfak>	     584670 (Rename ProposalLinkTable -> EntityLinkTable)
[18:51:30] <halfak>	     584678 (Rename ProposalLinkTableHelper -> EntityLinkTableHelper)
[18:51:34] <halfak>	 Pivoted the proposed Jade toast to stop relying on OOUI Dialog and rely on OOUI Element instead.
[18:51:36] <halfak>	     Problem:
[18:51:38] <halfak>	         - I noticed the OOUI Dialog displays elements (like the dialog header and footer) on the page that we shall not need.
[18:51:41] <halfak>	         - When activated, the Dialog content frame also covers the content below it which would be intrusive to user actions.
[18:51:44] <halfak>	     Solution:
[18:51:46] <halfak>	         - The OOUI Element is light weight on the page, doesn't cover content and is much easier to position.
[18:51:49] <halfak>	 then ac.craze:
[18:51:51] <halfak>	 Y: Worked on naming conflicts related to secondary integrations for Jade
[18:51:53] <halfak>	 T: Continuing work on the naming conflicts, will also looking at rendering comments for revision history a bit more
[18:51:56] <halfak>	 and me: 
[18:51:58] <halfak>	 Y: Vacation!  I rode my bike a lot but had a knee injury.  
[18:52:00] <halfak>	 T: Catching up on emails primarily. I had some management meetings this morning.  I'll spend the rest of the day catching up on quarterly tuning stuff. 
[18:54:31] <chtnnh>	 halfak you okay?
[18:55:03] <halfak>	 Yeah.  Doing alright.  More of a scare for my amateur cycling career than anything. 
[18:55:26] <halfak>	 Fun fact, I'm a bit of a bike racer.  I train ~15 hours per week for most of the year. 
[18:56:07] <chtnnh>	 XD
[18:56:17] <chtnnh>	 woah
[18:56:26] <chtnnh>	 thats amazing
[18:56:29] <chtnnh>	 whats your average speed 
[18:58:13] <chtnnh>	 hey haksoat
[18:58:29] <haksoat>	 Hello chtnnh
[19:03:04] <chtnnh>	 how are you
[19:18:56] <haksoat>	 I'm good. You? chtnnh
[19:19:26] <chtnnh>	 really good! haksoat. Havent seen you in a while
[19:19:29] <chtnnh>	 what have you been upto
[19:21:06] <haksoat>	 Yeah
[19:22:09] <haksoat>	 Been in "learning mode" lately, not written a lot of code.
[19:28:28] <wikibugs>	 10Scoring-platform-team (Current), 10Wikilabels, 10articlequality-modeling, 10artificial-intelligence: Build article quality model for ptwikipedia - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T246663 (10Halfak) OK I think I got lost a bit earlier.  Let me try checking my assumptions again:  When we see a template t...
[19:37:07] <halfak>	 chtnnh, I just restarted the label extractor for ptwiki based on what we have learned from the phab task.  I'm extracting all possible labels but I think we might want to focus on the "primary" label.  I'd originally though that label was auto-generated. 
[19:38:14] <chtnnh>	 that sounds like some progress imo
[19:38:14] <chtnnh>	 lets see what we can do halfak
[19:59:39] <halfak>	 Still running the label extractor.  I should be able to report on what we get soon. 
[20:08:26] <chtnnh>	 great
[20:37:47] <halfak>	 Ha.  We're getting some zero quality articles. 
[20:37:59] <chtnnh>	 damn
[20:38:03] <halfak>	 That's undefined, but people must be using it for super-stubs. 
[20:38:07] <chtnnh>	 only a few tho
[20:39:41] <halfak>	 Yeah.  Tiny amount
[20:40:10] <halfak>	 Looks like it is probably a typo.  
[20:40:20] <halfak>	 Here's a zero-rated version of an article: https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pedro_Augusto_de_Saxe-Coburgo_e_Bragan%C3%A7a&oldid=26993505
[20:40:24] <halfak>	 Seems to me this is at least a 3
[20:40:52] <chtnnh>	 youre right
[20:40:53] <halfak>	 https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discuss%C3%A3o:Pedro_Augusto_de_Saxe-Coburgo_e_Bragan%C3%A7a&diff=26997762&oldid=26986343
[20:41:02] <halfak>	 This is the edit that sets a value of zero
[20:41:03] <chtnnh>	 its got references and pictures
[20:41:25] <halfak>	 This one fixes it: https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discuss%C3%A3o:Pedro_Augusto_de_Saxe-Coburgo_e_Bragan%C3%A7a&diff=next&oldid=27267275
[20:41:38] <halfak>	 Happens about a month later. 
[20:41:44] <chtnnh>	 makes it a 5 straight
[20:41:49] <chtnnh>	 thats strange
[20:41:51] <halfak>	 Right. 
[20:42:28] <chtnnh>	 its a little short to be 5 imo
[20:42:43] <halfak>	 I think we might want to filter our observations by setting some rules.  E.g. if it's scored a zero or a 1, but the article is longer thank 1k, we drop the observation
[20:43:18] <chtnnh>	 ignore that label per say
[20:43:21] <chtnnh>	 make sense
[20:43:30] <chtnnh>	 should we speak to Goethe about this first tho
[20:43:51] <halfak>	 Another: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Star_Batman_and_Robin_the_Boy_Wonder
[20:43:55] <halfak>	 This one seems right. 
[20:44:55] <halfak>	 Aha!  That one was done by a bot!
[20:45:11] <halfak>	 https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discuss%C3%A3o:All_Star_Batman_and_Robin_the_Boy_Wonder&diff=39342625&oldid=37410079
[20:45:20] <chtnnh>	 the bot is not all that unreliable then
[20:45:56] <chtnnh>	 the bot label was then verified by an editor
[22:04:39] <wikibugs>	 10Scoring-platform-team (Current), 10Wikilabels, 10articlequality-modeling, 10artificial-intelligence: Build article quality model for ptwikipedia - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T246663 (10Halfak) I re-ran the extractor with these new assumptions and got:        51 "0"   12861 "1"   19931 "2"   40944...
[22:07:54] <halfak>	 I'm going to hit the road.  Have a good one, folks!