[12:50:39] <halfak>	 o/
[13:19:32] <Helder>	 o/
[13:35:13] <wikibugs>	 10Scoring-platform-team (Current), 10Wikilabels, 10editquality-modeling, 10artificial-intelligence: Build draft quality model for ptwikipedia - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T246667 (10He7d3r) Here is an updated version of @Halfak 's script, css, and loader code: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?...
[13:40:15] <wikibugs>	 10ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team, 10artificial-intelligence: Review model performance for ptwiki 'articlequality' and 'draftquality' - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250809 (10GoEThe) That is fine. We had a bunch of comments on Telegram (https://t.me/wikipediapt), not easily recovered here.  I think it mi...
[13:46:22] <wikibugs>	 10ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team, 10artificial-intelligence: Review model performance for ptwiki 'articlequality' and 'draftquality' - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250809 (10He7d3r) >>! In T250809#6078671, @Chtnnh wrote: > @He7d3r has updated the message. What do you think about it now? I think we shoul...
[14:14:19] <wikibugs>	 10ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team, 10artificial-intelligence: Review model performance for ptwiki 'articlequality' and 'draftquality' - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250809 (10Halfak) See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ORES/Issues/Draft_quality for a centralized place to report issues.  I'd also be open t...
[15:15:03] <halfak>	 chtnnh, I left a comment on https://github.com/wikimedia/draftquality/pull/38
[15:15:19] <halfak>	 Looks like you just need to rebuild the model using the new hyperparameters and then we're good to go. 
[15:15:28] <chtnnh>	 let me just check that out
[15:15:41] <halfak>	 I'd then love to see a PR that uses words_to_watch and we can compare fitness. 
[15:16:01] <chtnnh>	 that will be coming right up after this one
[15:19:46] <chtnnh>	 so i am just going to rebuild the model in ores-misc-01 with the new parameters?
[15:23:55] <chtnnh>	 halfak ^
[15:24:42] <halfak>	 right
[15:25:07] <halfak>	 Make sure you let me merge your changes before you pull them down and cut a new branch. 
[15:25:15] <halfak>	 Either that or we're going to get really good at rebase :) 
[15:25:37] <chtnnh>	 haha :D
[15:26:00] <chtnnh>	 not sure i follow but i am going to take this slow and try to do it right first go
[15:36:49] <halfak>	 Let me know when the PR is ready as I plan to step away for the day soon. 
[15:36:57] <halfak>	 chtnnh, ^
[15:37:36] <chtnnh>	 will do as soon as I can then
[15:37:38] <chtnnh>	 https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio(a)_Discuss%C3%A3o:Chtnnh#ORES
[15:37:51] <chtnnh>	 can you check out my last reply to joalpe? ^ halfak
[15:38:37] <chtnnh>	 also do i need to rebuild tuning reports?
[15:40:18] <halfak>	 The tuning report tells you how to build the model.  
[15:40:25] <halfak>	 Essentially, you tune and then train. 
[15:40:34] <halfak>	 Using the information from the tuning report. 
[15:40:41] <halfak>	 Anyway so no need to retune now. 
[15:40:41] <chtnnh>	 thats what just did
[15:40:50] <chtnnh>	 right make sense
[15:41:31] <halfak>	 chtnnh, are you the anon in that conversation? 
[15:41:51] <chtnnh>	 meaning?
[15:44:38] <chtnnh>	 yes i think thats me halfak
[15:44:43] <chtnnh>	 i dont know why that happened tho
[15:45:02] <chtnnh>	 oh its becaused im not logged in
[22:37:26] <wikibugs>	 10ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team, 10artificial-intelligence: Review model performance for ptwiki 'articlequality' and 'draftquality' - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250809 (10He7d3r) @Halfak: what should be considered as a true positive in these multi-class classification problems? (when filling the temp...