[11:43:04] (03CR) 10Zfilipin: [C: 03+2] Selenium: Update to WebdriverIO v6 [extensions/ORES] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/597857 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T253261) (owner: 10Vidhi-Mody) [11:59:53] (03Merged) 10jenkins-bot: Selenium: Update to WebdriverIO v6 [extensions/ORES] - 10https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/597857 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T253261) (owner: 10Vidhi-Mody) [12:40:53] 10MediaWiki-extensions-ORES, 10ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team, 10Quality-and-Test-Engineering-Team (QTE), 10User-zeljkofilipin: Upgrade WebdriverIO in the ORES repository - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T253261 (10zeljkofilipin) p:05Triage→03Medium [12:41:30] 10MediaWiki-extensions-ORES, 10ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team, 10Quality-and-Test-Engineering-Team (QTE), 10User-zeljkofilipin: Upgrade WebdriverIO in the ORES repository - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T253261 (10zeljkofilipin) 05Open→03Resolved [13:37:36] o/ [14:07:25] 10MediaWiki-extensions-ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team, 10Patch-For-Review: Upgrade WebdriverIO version to v6 in extensions/ORES - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250900 (10zeljkofilipin) [14:07:38] 10MediaWiki-extensions-ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team, 10Patch-For-Review: Upgrade WebdriverIO version to v6 in extensions/ORES - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250900 (10zeljkofilipin) [14:07:56] 10MediaWiki-extensions-ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team, 10Quality-and-Test-Engineering-Team (QTE), 10Patch-For-Review, 10User-zeljkofilipin: Upgrade WebdriverIO version to v6 in extensions/ORES - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250900 (10zeljkofilipin) p:05Triage→03Medium [14:12:17] 10MediaWiki-extensions-ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team, 10Quality-and-Test-Engineering-Team (QTE), 10Patch-For-Review, 10User-zeljkofilipin: Upgrade WebdriverIO version to v6 in extensions/ORES - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250900 (10zeljkofilipin) 05Open→03Resolved https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/... [14:23:55] Hi halfak o/ [14:28:28] halfak o/ [14:28:50] Hey! Good evening! [14:29:36] Good morning :) [14:29:38] I have integrated Jade on the rollback page. [14:29:38] Problem: Whenever a Jade action is performed there is a page reload which MW interpretes as an attempt to do a double rollback and throws an error. [14:29:38] Proposed Solutions: [14:29:38] 1. Should we redirect users to the Jade main page after the 1st Jade action? [14:29:38] 2. Should we remove Jade actions from the rollback page so that users click the [ edit | talk ] links to use Jade actions? [14:46:19] (Sorry was just in a meeting. Back now) [14:46:34] cool.. [14:46:49] * halfak thinks about rollback page [14:49:00] Could we have the page reload go to the Jade Entity rather than trying to reload the rollback page? [14:55:57] Alright, the downside to the redirection is that a user may not expect this behviour so it might be a little jarring. (i.e they expected to stay on the rollback page but now they are on the Jade main page) [14:55:58] Also the downside to the links ( solution 2 above ) would be adding another step to the UX before a user gets to perform a Jade action. [14:55:58] Solution 2 might be easier on the user but I am also happy to implement solution 1 if you give it a green light. [14:58:38] kevinbazira, I've brought up doing the whole reload AJAX style before. It seems that there's strong hesitation about that. How come? [14:59:03] AJAX would be a lot better for the undo page too because it would make sure that no changes are lost across the reload. [15:00:45] Alright, let me look into an AJAX solution. [15:05:25] Let me know if there are a ton of hidden complexities to that. I'd like to avoid giving you a headache and an extra week of work. [15:10:49] I'll definitely let you :) [15:14:03] 10Scoring-platform-team, 10Outreach-Programs-Projects, 10Google-Summer-of-Code (2020), 10artificial-intelligence: Proposal (GSoC 2020): Implement articlequality and draftquality model for ptwiki and apply insights to models for bs, uk, hi wikis - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T247847 (10Chtnnh) [15:14:05] 10Scoring-platform-team, 10Wikilabels, 10articlequality-modeling, 10artificial-intelligence: Build article quality model for Ukrainian Wikipedia - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T251571 (10Chtnnh) [15:43:04] @halfak: I stumbled upon [15:43:04] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T249703 [15:43:09] which resulted in the creation of the tool [15:43:09] https://toolsadmin.wikimedia.org/tools/id/github-pr-closer [15:43:16] and I was wondering if something similar would be possible for issues/bugs. [15:43:27] However, according to [15:43:27] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T249703#6070118 [15:43:32] issues can be disabled from repository settings. [15:43:41] Would it be desirable to disable issues for ores-related repos? [15:44:02] Oh. Interesting. [15:44:03] Or maybe the risk of 'someone not wanting to go to Phabricator and giving up reporting their issues' would make it not worth to disable this? [15:44:04] Maybe. [15:44:19] I wonder if we can somehow bridge the github issues to phab. [15:44:28] E.g. auto-create and tag a phab task. [15:44:36] With a link to the github issue. [15:45:13] l [16:00:45] @halfak, I asked the author on wikimedia-dev and then created https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T253388 about that. Do you need some scoring-related tags to this task? [16:37:05] 10Scoring-platform-team, 10Wikilabels, 10articlequality-modeling, 10artificial-intelligence: Build article quality model for Dutch Wikipedia - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T223782 (10Encycloon) If you search for articles where the Stub assessment is removed: [[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:W... [16:40:33] 10Scoring-platform-team, 10artificial-intelligence: Unsophisticated bad actors dataset - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T252894 (10Halfak) This file structure makes sense to me. I think it would make sense to get this into a git repository so that we can maintain a version history. Even at 72MB, we have s... [16:40:55] He7d3r, jumped in to comment. Looks like this road has been well traveled. [16:42:39] 10Scoring-platform-team, 10Wikilabels, 10articlequality-modeling, 10artificial-intelligence: Build article quality model for Dutch Wikipedia - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T223782 (10Halfak) Interesting! Looking at the points at which stub tags are removed could give us an "improved" class. So we'd... [17:45:37] 10ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team (Current), 10artificial-intelligence: Review model performance for ptwiki 'articlequality' and 'draftquality' - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250809 (10He7d3r) Updated info (as of commit c3a66b0 plus the specific changes which define each of the tests): * [[https://gist.g... [17:59:13] 10ORES, 10Scoring-platform-team (Current), 10artificial-intelligence: Review model performance for ptwiki 'articlequality' and 'draftquality' - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T250809 (10Halfak) It looks like data since 2014 is most consistent and that should make sense as the assessment process is sociali... [20:08:52] wikimedia/articlequality#403 (since_2014 - 1346f67 : Helder): The build passed. https://travis-ci.org/wikimedia/articlequality/builds/690170937 [20:36:51] Hey folks. I'm going to step away soon to run some errands. I'll be back on tomorrow and Sunday because I need to do some paper writing. [20:37:05] But I figured I'd check if there's anything someone needs before I run away. [20:37:15] accraze, haksoat, Helder: ^ [20:37:27] Helder, looks like you are close to a PR. I could take a look before I go. [20:37:44] halfak, https://github.com/wikimedia/articlequality/pull/132 ? [20:38:38] If you want to submit a model you built, I'd review that too. If you built it on ores-misc-01, that works fore me. [20:39:45] halfak, I would like to confirm a few things first, then I would rebuild the model [20:40:15] OK sounds good. I can review tomorrow/Sunday too :) [20:40:22] Or later. No rush. [20:40:49] Eventually, I'm going to catch up with my revscoring-2.8.0 work and I might bug you to rebase. If you beat me, you won't need to deal with that ;) [20:44:24] halfak, I'll just for you input on my last few questions on that PR [20:44:56] Aha! Missed the questions. [20:46:03] I was just dumping them there as they occurred.. [20:48:48] OK answered [20:48:56] Looks like you have the right ideas across the board. [20:50:00] Great [21:17:10] OK actually running away now. Have a good weekend!