[00:38:01] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10MediaWiki-Database, 10Availability (MediaWiki-MultiDC), 10Performance-Team (Radar): wfWaitForSlaves in JobRunner can massively slow down run rate if just a single slave is lagged - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95799#4058014 (10Krinkle)
[00:38:16] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10MediaWiki-Database, 10Availability, 10Performance-Team (Radar): wfWaitForSlaves in JobRunner can massively slow down run rate if just a single slave is lagged - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95799#1200679 (10Krinkle)
[07:17:23] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Operations, 10hardware-requests: Decommission db1009 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T189216#4058198 (10Marostegui) So, the checks finished and there were differences on testreduce_0715.results (173GB) table, between the following rows: ``` 40590911 40650121 ``` I have confirmed that this is not...
[08:41:48] <wikibugs>	 10DBA, 10Patch-For-Review: Decommission db1020 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T189773#4058223 (10Marostegui) There is a logical backup of db1020 at: `es2001:/srv/backups/older/m2/db1020/dump.m2.2018-03-16--16-20-10` So this host can now go ahead and get decommissioned