[05:06:17] 10DBA, 10Goal, 10Patch-For-Review: Productionize db21[21-31} - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T228969 (10Marostegui) [05:17:15] 10DBA, 10MediaWiki-File-management, 10Performance-Team (Radar): Drop filejournal table from WMF - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T51195 (10Marostegui) @aaron are you sure this table isn't created by default? I just checked the most recent wiki we created `yuewiktionary` {T205714} which was created the 14t... [05:27:37] 10DBA, 10Operations, 10decommission: Decommission db2050.codfw.wmnet - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230391 (10Marostegui) [05:27:53] 10DBA, 10Operations, 10decommission: Decommission db2050.codfw.wmnet - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230391 (10Marostegui) p:05Triage→03Normal [05:29:04] 10DBA, 10Operations: Decommission db2043-db2069 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T228258 (10Marostegui) [05:29:33] 10DBA, 10Operations, 10decommission, 10Patch-For-Review: Decommission db2050.codfw.wmnet - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230391 (10Marostegui) [05:39:34] 10DBA, 10Operations, 10decommission, 10Patch-For-Review: Decommission db2050.codfw.wmnet - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230391 (10Marostegui) [05:48:43] 10DBA, 10Operations: Decommission db2043-db2069 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T228258 (10Marostegui) [07:24:37] 10DBA, 10Operations: Decommission db2043-db2069 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T228258 (10Marostegui) [07:31:16] 10DBA, 10Operations: Decommission db2043-db2069 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T228258 (10Marostegui) [07:32:03] 10DBA, 10Operations, 10decommission: Decommission db2057.codfw.wmnet - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230394 (10Marostegui) [07:35:30] 10DBA, 10Operations, 10decommission: Decommission db2057.codfw.wmnet - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230394 (10Marostegui) p:05Triage→03Normal [07:54:54] 10DBA, 10Operations, 10decommission, 10Patch-For-Review: Decommission db2057.codfw.wmnet - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230394 (10Marostegui) [08:46:43] 10DBA, 10Operations, 10decommission, 10Patch-For-Review: Decommission db2057.codfw.wmnet - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230394 (10Marostegui) [08:51:11] 10DBA, 10Operations: Decommission db2043-db2069 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T228258 (10Marostegui) [09:23:16] 10DBA, 10MediaWiki-extensions-Renameuser: Fix use of DB schema so RenameUser is trivial - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T33863 (10Marostegui) After all the changes with the actor migration and so forth (per T224348#5226167), global renames are now pretty fast, almost instant, almost 8 years after this task... [15:59:11] 10DBA, 10conftool, 10Patch-For-Review: #dbctl: add 'comment'/'description' metadata to instances - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T229677 (10CDanis) >>! In T229677#5409083, @Volans wrote: > I'm ok with the proposed UI but I'm wondering if we could reduce the duplication for the DBAs to set both a commit m... [17:43:39] I have a question related to a phabricator ticket I've been working on at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T226068#5377508. In short, we are running a promo campaign on the mobile site (e.g. https://en.m.wikipedia.org) for a new feature. We want to show a drawer promoting the feature to each logged in user on the mobile site, but they should only see the drawer once. One of the solutions we were considering was to create a record [17:43:39] in the user_properties table to mark when a logged in user has seen the drawer so that they would not see it again. However, this would effectively mean that there would be a record created for each logged in user of the mobile site. Would adding this number of records (also considering frequency) to the user_properties table be okay? [18:24:29] nray: Jaime I think is still on vacation, and Manuel is already gone for the day. what I suggest you to do make sure your question gets noticed is put it in a sub-task on Phab with the DBA tag, so they see it on their workboard