[13:59:11] <codezee>	 tonythomas: there?
[15:08:58] <tonythomas>	 codezee: now I am !
[15:09:03] <tonythomas>	 ssup ?
[15:42:58] <codezee>	 tonythomas: see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89416#2067542 I'm sure a project can't have two interns, but I couldn't find a suitable link to support it
[15:43:02] <codezee>	 so can you have a look
[15:54:58] <tonythomas>	 codezee: oh. wow
[15:55:29] <tonythomas>	 it seems like we had one test case of 2 interns/project back somewhere. sometimes andre__ would remember
[15:55:42] <tonythomas>	 but, we did not appreciate it last time ( when such a case came up )
[15:55:49] <tonythomas>	 and even this time too, Niharika ?
[15:57:11] <Niharika>	 tonythomas: codezee: Didn't happen this time but yeah, it did happen once (couple of years ago, I think). I think the general agreement was that it was not a good idea to do that and we shouldn't repeat the experiment.
[15:57:52] <tonythomas>	 Niharika: exactly. commenting now
[15:58:16] <Niharika>	 tonythomas: codezee: Instead, it'd be desirable if the project can be broken up cleanly into two non-overlapping parts which makes it easier to evaluate each student on their work independently.
[15:58:28] <Niharika>	 tonythomas: Okay.
[15:58:35] <tonythomas>	 Niharika: practical. true
[15:58:39] <tonythomas>	 adding that too to the comment
[16:04:48] <tonythomas>	 Niharika: codezee : added as rule 10, https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Outreach_programs/Life_of_a_successful_project#For_possible_mentors
[16:14:19] <codezee>	 tonythomas: I think this could be featured, we just need one more mentor https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T91192
[16:32:38] <andre__>	 tonythomas: https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/faq says "only an individual may work on a given project."
[16:32:44] <andre__>	 (if that's what your question was)
[16:33:35] <tonythomas>	 andre__: thanks for that one. I added something similar to the docs anyway
[16:33:48] <tonythomas>	 codezee: yeah. Lets wait for one more mentor, and move it to the other column
[16:33:58] <tonythomas>	 also, our https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/google-summer-of-code-2016/ looks empty
[16:40:38] <codezee>	 tonythomas: I think we can tag the confirmed projects in the featured column with google-summer-of-code-2016 to populate that
[16:41:10] <tonythomas>	 codezee: true. who should ? :D
[16:44:37] <codezee>	 tonythomas: I went through the projects, they were featured for Outreachy 11 and so I tried getting a re-confirmation, got on some, but about some I'm still unsure
[16:45:41] <tonythomas>	 oeky. then we can wait