[06:05:23] <tonythomas>	 qgil: hey! anything more blocking before we can get https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Blog/Drafts/Wikimedia_welcome_its_8_Google_Summer_of_Code_2016_Interns into the official blog ?
[06:05:35] <tonythomas>	 its been almost a week :(
[06:06:08] <tonythomas>	 I am not happy about the images though
[06:06:19] <tonythomas>	 do we have anything somewhere to post something about Google Summer of Code ?
[06:06:32] <tonythomas>	 right now, its just two logo
[06:07:10] <qgil>	 Hi tonythomas have you checked whether any students have posted images in their profiles?
[06:07:21] <qgil>	 I will review the post today.
[06:07:39] <tonythomas>	 qgil: images ? this round selects ?
[06:08:22] <qgil>	 You were asking for pictures, so here is an idea.  :)
[06:09:24] <tonythomas>	 all we have is https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Outreachy
[06:09:26] <tonythomas>	 that one
[06:11:05] <andre__>	 Profile images in Phab would be only 100x100px (if I got the idea correctly)
[06:11:43] <andre__>	 didn't check mw.org pages
[06:12:08] <tonythomas>	 andre__: true, and will people like their images coming up live ? ( some might be wearing cloak of invisibility )
[06:12:22] <qgil>	 I just did, nothing. In fact, I was surprised that most students registered via ldap and not mw.o
[06:12:38] <qgil>	 (or maybe it is the UI, which is just inviting to register this way)
[06:12:45] <qgil>	 anyway, there is not much indeed: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Google_Summer_of_Code
[06:13:22] <andre__>	 It is the UI I am afraid. (I found the bug yesterday why we don't say anymore on the frontpage to click the MediaWiki button down there so it'll get fixed in the next days.)
[06:16:01] <tonythomas>	 if we request for students to give images, it might still delay - I guess. Can we have something general about Google Summer of Code  ?
[06:16:43] <tonythomas>	 https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/resources/media
[06:17:09] <tonythomas>	 ah. dont click - nothing major there
[06:20:33] <andre__>	 Hmm. Generic "My hand uses a keyboard" image at https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/11/16/google-summer-of-code-2015/
[06:23:02] <tonythomas>	 that looks better :D
[06:28:32] <qgil>	 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alphanumeric_keyboard.jpg
[06:28:43] <qgil>	 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Keyboards_(computing)
[07:04:03] <tonythomas>	 qgil: andre__ : we are enforcing 'every GSoC project have their own individual project in phab', right ?
[07:04:38] <qgil>	 sure
[07:04:51] <qgil>	 unles there is a perfect fit already
[07:05:06] <tonythomas>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T130574  -- which might fit in Mediawiki-codesniffer
[07:05:17] <tonythomas>	 not completely sure though
[07:05:32] <tonythomas>	 but, it would be clean to make it a different project, for notifications sake
[07:09:29] <qgil>	 If in doubt, please ask the mentors.
[07:12:54] <tonythomas>	 qgil: true. we have conpherences ready :D
[07:16:56] <tonythomas>	 qgil: done in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133647#2255857
[07:17:22] <qgil>	 good, thank you
[07:18:04] <tonythomas>	 qgil: welcome. and happy that the interns created the tasks themselves, blocking correctly!~
[08:11:46] <Niharika>	 tonythomas: Hey! Andre gave me superpowers on phab so I can create projects for the students. Any who haven't created it yet and I can help?
[08:12:08] <tonythomas>	 Niharika: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T133647#2255857 ?
[08:12:18] <tonythomas>	 I asked them to talk with mentors though
[08:13:26] <Niharika>	 tonythomas: I meant, should I create project boards for projects which do need them and haven't bothered to file a ticket for one?
[08:13:43] <Niharika>	 Phabricator projects*
[08:25:11] <tonythomas>	 Niharika: okey. Project boards for phab-projects ? in #google-summer-of-code-2016 ?
[08:26:18] <Niharika>	 tonythomas: Phabricator projects, I meant. Like #mediawiki-codesniffer, #crosswatch etc.
[08:26:45] <tonythomas>	 okey. Lets create then!
[08:26:49] <Niharika>	 Every GSoC project needs its own individual Phabricator project.
[08:27:13] <tonythomas>	 Niharika: true
[08:27:52] <Niharika>	 tonythomas: Could you collect data on which ones we need to create and what name for each? Then I can create them.
[08:28:08] <Niharika>	 I imagine some students have already requested projects.
[08:28:10] <tonythomas>	 Niharika: okey. Should I create a task for that ?
[08:28:12] <tonythomas>	 true
[08:28:25] <Niharika>	 tonythomas: Yeah, sure!
[08:28:34] <tonythomas>	 like - Goal : Every project has its own Phabricator task
[08:28:43] <Niharika>	 Yup.
[08:35:48] <tonythomas>	 Niharika: updated description in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T134154
[08:36:41] <Niharika>	 tonythomas: Okay, awesome. If you can come up with names for the projects, that would be fantastic. :P
[08:36:51] <tonythomas>	 Niharika: that is the tough part :D
[08:37:17] <Niharika>	 Yeah. :P
[08:39:31] <tonythomas>	 edited. :D
[08:55:31] <Niharika>	 Cool. I'll be back after lunch!
[11:44:47] <Niharika>	 tonythomas: I'm holding off on the project creation task for a bit. I want to make sure the project we want to create doesn't already exist and that we are following the naming convention. Like extensions are usually named as MediaWiki-extensions-ExtensionName
[11:45:49] <andre__>	 (Personally I don't think that "_Every_ GSoC/Outreachy project _must_ have its _own_ Phab project" makes sense. Emphasis by me; in many cases it does but not in all.)
[11:47:51] <Niharika>	 andre__: I agree. A lot of times they overlap with existing projects and I'd prefer we reuse existing boards.
[11:53:50] <tonythomas>	 Niharika: true that.
[11:53:58] <tonythomas>	 I agree.
[16:55:25] <andre__>	 Code Review guidelines documentation...
[16:55:29] <andre__>	 Before: https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Gerrit/Code_review/Getting_reviews&oldid=1910448
[16:55:30] <andre__>	 After: https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Gerrit/Code_review/Getting_reviews&oldid=2113564
[16:55:57] <andre__>	 Killing content feels pretty good. :)
[16:57:16] <andre__>	 Someone tell me if I'm too radical (it's just a first step).