[19:53:26] <petan> test
[19:53:33] <petan> ok
[19:57:53] <petan> !gerrit
[20:6:41] <petan> ok, bots sorted ^^
[20:8:18] <petan> Ryan_Lane: do you want me to log -operations too?
[20:8:22] <petan> or other chans
[20:8:28] <Ryan_Lane> Sure
[20:8:43] <petan> http://bots.wmflabs.org/~petrb/logs/%23wikimedia-operations/
[20:8:44] <petan> here
[20:9:11] <petan> if you wanted to log any other channel just type @add chanel
[20:9:24] <petan> it's simple
[20:20:34] <petan> hey RoanKattouw I finished all features you wanted
[20:20:41] <petan> including html
[20:22:8] <Ryan_Lane> How awesome is petan? Seriously.
[20:22:39] <Ryan_Lane> I've wanted all of these things for our ops channels for ages
[20:23:45] <RoanKattouw> Yay!
[20:23:49] <RoanKattouw> All hail petan
[20:23:53] <petan> XD
[20:23:55] <Ryan_Lane> Heh.
[20:24:5] <petan> do you want it even in -tech?
[20:24:9] <petan> or somewhere
[20:24:15] <Ryan_Lane> I think our bots may actually be better than what the devs have now :$
[20:24:19] <Ryan_Lane> Err :)
[20:24:31] <RoanKattouw> Well they were based on what we have now
[20:24:36] <Ryan_Lane> I guess we can have it in tech too
[20:24:41] <petan> heh, that was goal of this bot to replace mw-bot :D
[20:24:43] <Ryan_Lane> Doesn't hurt
[20:24:51] <petan> @add #wikimedia-tech
[20:24:55] <petan> I mean for logging purpose
[20:27:33] <petan> biggest advantage of this bot compared to mw is that it doesn't run on toolserver :D
[20:27:45] <Ryan_Lane> I want to update the bugzilla bot to output to different channels based on configuration like component or something like that
[20:27:58] <petan> aha
[20:28:12] <Ryan_Lane> I'd like OpenStack related bugs in here, for instance
[20:28:15] <petan> that shouldn't be problem
[20:28:25] <petan> I don't know how current bot works
[20:28:39] <petan> but if it's possible to divide bugs somehow it should be ok
[20:28:46] <Ryan_Lane> It's a pain
[20:28:51] <petan> heh
[20:29:13] <Ryan_Lane> Really we need bugzilla to write messages into files and just use an echo bot
[20:29:23] <Ryan_Lane> That would be much easier
[20:29:40] <petan> I thought that's how does it work
[20:29:56] <petan> hm...
[20:30:6] <Ryan_Lane> It's based on some weird email bs
[20:30:11] <petan> ah
[20:30:23] <petan> that makes sense... but it should be possible to convert that to a file
[20:30:46] <petan> but there would need to run some daemon somewhere receiving the mails and putting output to a file
[20:31:25] <Ryan_Lane> Yeah. We have a bugtracker project. Someone should set up bugzilla in it so that we can see what's possible :)
[20:31:26] <Ryan_Lane> Yeah, I want to avoid that
[20:31:43] <Ryan_Lane> I'd prefer bugZilla to write the messages directly to files
[20:32:28] <petan> right
[20:33:44] <Ryan_Lane> Then the logic can be done in bugzilla, which should hopefully be much more flexible
[20:33:57] <petan> definitely
[20:43:33] <labs-nagios-wm> PROBLEM Total Processes is now: WARNING on bots-cb bots-cb output: PROCS WARNING: 180 processes
[20:53:33] <labs-nagios-wm> RECOVERY Total Processes is now: OK on bots-cb bots-cb output: PROCS OK: 101 processes
[21:7:44] <hashar> oh I got a funny issue now :)
[21:8:6] <hashar> I have reused a puppet class which deploy the integration.mediawiki.org virtual host
[21:8:10] <hashar> but on a labs server
[21:8:17] <hashar> thus I am lacking the /etc/ssl/certs/star.wikimedia.org.pem cert
[21:8:48] <hashar> and the labs apache2 complains about a syntax error since:  SSLCertificateFile: file '/etc/ssl/certs/star.wikimedia.org.pem' does not exist or is empty
[21:9:46] <hashar> so now I am wondering how we can fix that.  Should we create fake production certificates on labs by just linking to wmf-labs.pem ?
[21:11:6] <Ryan_Lane> We have a fake one
[21:11:49] <Ryan_Lane> I guess linking to it is likely the best way. We've been doing realm specific configuration, but that would be easier
[21:11:59] <Ryan_Lane> The bad thing is, there's two Crete
[21:12:6] <Ryan_Lane> Two certs
[21:12:49] <Ryan_Lane> I need to learn how to create SAN certs, then it can just be one
[21:17:35] <Ryan_Lane> hashar: I'd say it's safe to link to the wmflabs.pem, since it is much more likely to be used.
[21:18:4] <Ryan_Lane> And at some point I'll figure out SAN certs and combine the two.
[21:18:15] <hashar> yeah it is not that much an issue for me
[21:18:30] <hashar> I mean, linking to the labs certificate is enough for me :D
[21:18:33] <hashar> will just do that manually
[21:19:23] <hashar> one possibility would be to have some kind of variable so we can act differently depending on puppet being running on production or test
[21:19:26] <hashar> something like :
[21:19:46] <hashar> if TEST {  /* puppet statements */ }
[21:19:58] <hashar> if PROD { /*some other statement */}
[21:21:37] <petan> hashar: that's already here
[21:21:50] <petan> I think that Ryan used it in case of something recently
[21:21:56] <petan> nrpe
[21:21:59] <petan> that was that
[21:22:13] <hashar> ohh
[21:22:14] <petan> check nrpe config
[21:23:23] <Ryan_Lane> Its $realm
[21:23:39] <Ryan_Lane> $realm is either labs or production
[21:24:1] <petan> !$realm is either labs or production
[21:24:3] <petan> :P
[21:24:7] <Ryan_Lane> I guess in the future it's possible it could be other things too
[21:24:31] <Ryan_Lane> $realm chooses between clusters in the same $site
[21:25:3] <Ryan_Lane> Where $site is datacenter (seams, pmtpa, eqiad)
[21:25:9] <Ryan_Lane> Ugh
[21:25:18] <Ryan_Lane> Seams = esams
[21:34:26] <hashar> will have a look at that
[21:34:29] <hashar> thanks to both of you :-)
[23:41:33] <labs-nagios-wm> PROBLEM Total Processes is now: WARNING on bots-cb bots-cb output: PROCS WARNING: 177 processes
[23:46:33] <labs-nagios-wm> RECOVERY Total Processes is now: OK on bots-cb bots-cb output: PROCS OK: 102 processes
[1:31:50] <hyperon> sorry guys that i've been afk for the most part of the last week
[1:32:14] <hyperon> what did i miss while i was AWOL?
[3:42:15] <hyperon> Ryan_Lane: hello
[4:3:42] * SigMobile ACTION pokes petan 
[4:4:29] <SigMobile> Ah, shit, logged channel.
[7:23:11] <petan> SigMobile: hm
[7:48:28] <petan> !labs Access
[7:48:40] <petan> SigMobile
[7:48:46] <SigMobile> Mhm?
[7:48:52] <SigMobile> OK
[7:49:1] <petan> have a svn acc?
[7:56:52] <petan> @regsearch .
[7:57:40] <petan> !bz is https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/$1
[7:57:56] <petan> !b alias bz
[7:58:3] <petan> !b test
[7:58:16] <petan> !b unalias
[7:58:19] <petan> !b alias bz
[10:14:59] <mutante> where was the "security group -> instance" config? can setup groups, can setup instances, but where was the connection between the 2
[13:50:14] <gerrit-wm> New review: Mark Bergsma; "Please fix indentation before you merge this into production - each file resource's parameters on on..." [operations/puppet] (test) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1539
[14:1:44] <gerrit-wm> New review: Demon; "(no comment)" [operations/puppet] (test); V: 0 C: 1;  - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1540
[14:6:58] <gerrit-wm> New review: Mark Bergsma; "You require class 'ganglia' in ganglia::web, but that only takes care of 'gmond' currently (and perh..." [operations/puppet] (test); V: 0 C: 0;  - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1540
[14:57:19] <gerrit-wm> New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/production' into test" [operations/puppet] (test) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1556
[14:57:50] <gerrit-wm> New review: Mark Bergsma; "(no comment)" [operations/puppet] (test); V: 0 C: 2;  - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1556
[14:57:51] <gerrit-wm> Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (test) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1556
[15:13:45] <gerrit-wm> New patchset: Mark Bergsma; "Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/production' into test" [operations/puppet] (test) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1557
[15:13:58] <gerrit-wm> New review: Mark Bergsma; "(no comment)" [operations/puppet] (test); V: 0 C: 2;  - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1557
[15:14:12] <gerrit-wm> New review: Mark Bergsma; "(no comment)" [operations/puppet] (test); V: 0 C: 2;  - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1557
[15:14:13] <gerrit-wm> Change merged: Mark Bergsma; [operations/puppet] (test) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1557
[16:10:42] <gerrit-wm> New review: Demon; "Curious if there's an update here since it's been untouched since October. Is it obsolete? Still nee..." [operations/puppet] (udp2log) C: 0;  - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/492
[16:19:3] <petan|w> hi Ryan
[16:22:16] <petan|w> @regsearch .
[16:23:52] <petan|w> !bot
[16:24:31] <petan|w> !projects
[16:46:33] <Barras> petan|w!!
[16:46:40] <Barras> Your bot is cloaked!
[16:46:47] * Barras ACTION is sooo awesome! :p
[16:52:34] <Nemo_bis> petan|w, it would be really nice to add some contact info or info about operator(s) on that meta page
[16:54:35] <petan|w> Nemo_bis: ok
[16:54:43] <Nemo_bis> thanks
[16:54:47] <petan|w> actually the point is that anyone with access to labs can be operator
[16:55:7] <Nemo_bis> that's not so obvious, though
[16:55:9] <petan|w> it's running on bots-1 in shared folder
[17:22:7] <gerrit-wm> Change abandoned: Bhartshorne; "taken care of elsewhere." [operations/puppet] (udp2log) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/492
[18:4:3] <LeslieCarr> petan: thank you for the new bot :)
[18:12:12] <petan> hi Leslie
[18:12:17] <petan> you are welcome!
[18:12:18] <LeslieCarr> hey
[18:12:19] <LeslieCarr> :)
[18:36:54] <hashar> re for a few sec
[18:37:53] <Barras> ssmollett: cloak set, in the case you didn't get my pm.
[18:40:10] <petan> Barras: good work
[18:40:52] * Barras ACTION knows. :p
[18:43:38] <ssmollett> thanks!
[19:4:46] <Ryan_Lane> andrewbogott: still no cloak for you?
[19:4:47] <Ryan_Lane> heh
[19:5:12] <andrewbogott> I keep not doing anything, and nothing keeps happening.  It's a perfect system!
[19:5:23] <Ryan_Lane> :D