[16:34:24] bmansurov, do you think you could give me a hand setting up RelatedPages on my local instance? I've got all the variables set and whatnot and I still can't get it to show up and I've been at this for a couple hours now :/ [16:34:46] I had it working months ago but I've wiped vagrant since then [16:35:18] oh he's not on IRC... [18:05:37] jhobs: here's my config https://gist.github.com/joakin/ea367612fbe3375ee1e0 [18:06:00] joakino: yep, that's what I've got... weird... [18:06:03] jhobs: i cloned cards and relatedarticles to extensions, and previously for other things i enabled the vagrant role cirrussearch [18:06:48] joakino: hmm maybe it's because I don't have cirrussearch locally; I was first just trying to use the wikitext way [18:07:50] it may be crashing if you have [18:07:50] $wgRelatedArticlesUseCirrusSearch to true [18:08:15] jhobs: poke around /vagrant/logs and see if there are any exceptions [18:09:47] not seeing any errors... I'll add cirrussearch first see if that magically fixes it [18:10:46] joakino: could there be some kind of minimum number of articles needed on the wiki? Like I said, fresh(ish) instance so I haven't cloned many yet [18:14:08] jhobs: maybe, try querying your local articles to see if there are results from morelike [18:14:14] jhobs: with something like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ApiSandbox#action=query&format=json&maxlag=&list=search&srsearch=morelike%3Abanana&srlimit=3 [18:14:42] this if you don't have the api sandbox locally https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&format=json&maxlag=&list=search&srsearch=morelike%3Abanana&srlimit=3 [18:15:33] joakino: any way to easily export a bunch of articles? I've always just done a few one at a time when setting up my local wikis [18:15:50] yeah [18:15:53] and just edited them with whatever I needed [18:16:28] av issues [18:18:18] legoktm jdlrobson hey, are we in okay shape on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124356 or is further action required to remedy the breakage? [18:19:34] I'm not sure [18:20:27] jhobs: i usually have a couple of dumps that I use to populate my test wikis [18:20:52] you can go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Export and get the pages you want as an xml dump [18:20:57] then import it to your test wiki [18:21:10] jhobs: i've sent you an email with my dumps and some links/instructions to populate it [18:21:17] yeah ok, that's how I've always done it too [18:21:20] let me know how it goes, i gtg 10 minutes and then meeting [18:21:25] I just didn't know it could do multiple [18:21:31] yeah :D [18:21:57] wait this UI looks different... I wonder if I was using something else actually [18:21:59] weird [18:22:01] my dumps are broken because I forgot to export the templates though haha [18:22:04] but whatever [18:22:06] anyways, thanks joakino! [18:22:47] oooooh I bet I was using Special:Export/ArticleName or something [18:25:34] jdlrobson: hey i will try and join as soon as im done with standup [18:32:13] ping joakino dr0ptp4kt nzr (when ready) [18:54:39] bearND: hey [18:56:37] matanya: hello [18:57:13] bearND: I would like to report something i suspect is a bug [18:57:20] would that be ok ? [18:58:28] bearND: o/ any issue with me merging "API client for reading lists, part 1"? [18:58:49] matanya: sure. Would you like to open a Phab task for that if you don't find it already in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/wikipedia-android-app-backlog/. The last column there has a bug reporting template. [18:58:57] niedzielski: none. ty [18:59:50] matanya: or feel free to discuss with niedzielski, who's the current tech lead for the Android app. Unfortunately, I'll have to run to an appointment in a few minutes. [19:00:59] bearND: thanks, i am not sure it is a bug, hence wanted to ask here [19:01:10] niedzielski would be great too :) [19:01:10] matanya: hello! what bug are you seeing? [19:01:25] steps to reproduce: [19:01:35] open the app, choose lang hebrew [19:02:14] go to antonin sochor article [19:02:21] try to edit a section [19:02:43] any section you choose opens the leading section for editing ? [19:05:17] matanya: yeah, it looks that way on my device too. i think i'm also seeing it for english [19:05:33] latest alpah, btw [19:05:38] is it a known bug ? [19:06:15] niedzielski: matanya: the correct section opens for editing in the beta app. must be a recent regression [19:06:34] I wonder if it's https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124356 [19:06:38] matanya: actually, it looks like it's opening the previous section for edit [19:07:34] my hunch is that it is [19:08:01] ori: doesn't happen to me on desktop or mobile view [19:08:42] matanya: it's not consistently reproducible, and the views are not necessarily sharing the same parser cache entry [19:09:05] anyways, it could also be unrelated [19:10:33] mdholloway: it looks like it's happening in beta for me. can you try again? maybe ori's right :) [19:11:25] you should say ori is probably right, that is the default behaviour... ;) [19:11:31] hi. i am looking to contribute some code. do you have an open "issue" (GitHub?) that would take about half a day to implement? [19:11:47] hello maroloccio [19:11:49] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/wikipedia-android-app-backlog/ [19:11:57] this is the backlog ^ [19:12:34] maroloccio: if this is your first contribution, consider reading our getting started guide first: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Apps/Team/Wikipedia_Android_app_hacking [19:12:38] interesting.. any particular thing that i could dev in the next 3 days, investing a total of 1/2 day on it? [19:12:52] niedzielski: hmm. i tried a bunch of times in the beta app for various sections in both the czech and hebrew articles for antonin sochor. this is with the current beta (2.1.141-beta-2016-02-10) [19:12:53] niedzielski: will read that [19:15:06] maroloccio: oh and for non-Android projects, this might be more appropriate: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/How_to_become_a_MediaWiki_hacker [19:15:32] maroloccio: we try to mark easier tasks with the Easy tag in phabricator. you can see them across _all_ projects here: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/search/query/ixrUKv30lu9V/#R [19:16:15] matanya: mdholloway: niedzielski: possibly related to https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T65874 ? [19:16:48] niedzielski: aha, just repro'd the previous-section behavior in the czech version in the beta app. (also found a separate ui issue to file.) [19:17:13] dbrant: looks like the same bug, yeah [19:17:54] i can reproduce this in each and every try [19:18:12] niedzielski: Android would be best. i'll look for an easy one.. unless there's a _specific_ one that does not risk ending up in a "race condition" (e.g. who does it first in the next 3 days) [19:18:32] I see an odd tag line on http://en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page btw "NRFXKMZHCfSxFZuyrbAC" [19:18:37] Not sure if that's a bug or just test data [19:18:48] Krinkle: thanks for the new rtrc, i love it [19:19:13] matanya: Thanks :) [19:20:30] maroloccio: hm, i recommend avoiding tasks in the needs triage and current sprint columns. tasks marked Easy and the bug backlog column are normally the safest to pull from. [19:20:52] maroloccio: i'll see if i can find a good starter task. just a moment [19:21:23] jdlrobson: Can I enable lazy loading as a user in prod at the moment, or in beta labs? I don't see it in the prefs. [19:21:47] enableImages, beta, all sections, font size. on enwiki in beta labs [19:22:32] maroloccio: T104094 might be a good one [19:22:37] matanya: niedzielski: yeah, you're right, i can reproduce consistently in alpha and beta now. i think i inadvertently switched to the production app before. :/ [19:24:28] bearND|afk: when you get back, would you mind confirming that https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/274848/ is ready for merge? mdholloway dbrant, anything else we want to get in the next beta? [19:25:08] niedzielski: nothing else from me on the app side [19:25:10] niedzielski: not that i know of [19:27:23] dbrant: so https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T65874 just went away (from the client's perspective) of its own accord? time to read through https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124356... it seems there's an action api fix that isn't being done in our content service when we construct sections [19:29:21] mdholloway: i'm actually not convinced that the two are related. I wasn't aware of the latter until now [19:30:50] dbrant: yeah, looking at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T124356 again i'm not sure. the correct section opens for me every time in the production app, which makes me think this is a mwapi vs. content service issue (which T124356 doesn't have anything to do with) [19:32:09] niedzielski: should i file a bug report, or no need ? [19:35:32] mdholloway /cc matanya: hm, maybe you're right that it's only a content service issue. should we increase the priority of this? [19:36:14] niedzielski: yeah, i'd call it high priority in light of the impending content service rollout in the production app. [19:38:50] ori: weird tags were newly added to the diff view and history, is that also related to a known bug ? [19:38:54] bb all [19:39:43] o/ [19:41:28] later joakino! [19:43:05] niedzielski: dbrant: i'll make this bug my focus in the near term if no one objects. (do you anticipate much more work needed on the background saved page syncing patch)? [19:45:08] mdholloway: that should be ok; How long would you anticipate this would take to fix? [19:47:31] niedzielski: thank you for choosing T104094 for me.. i'll look into it (i was looking myself in the last few mins..) [19:47:38] dbrant: hard to say, can i do let me do a little poking around just to identify the issue and let you know? [19:47:48] mdholloway: yep, sure [19:50:10] mdholloway: probably :) there's a lot of interdepednencies between the reading list patches that will no doubt cause some churn. i vote for getting the content service prod ready first but i recommend picking up another reading list task from the current sprint when you can. there's a lot of nebulousness still floating around for reading lists and [19:50:11] we need to work hard to define what our implementation should look like [19:50:32] maroloccio: sounds good. feel free to assign it to yourself in phabricator if you'd like to work on it :) [19:58:52] niedzielski: agreed on prioritizing getting the content service prod ready. i'd say this is arguably a blocker for the rollout. [19:59:22] parent it! [20:01:02] dbrant: :) [20:15:31] Krinkle: nope not yet [20:15:43] Krinkle: there were some bugs we wanted to clean up before making it available [20:15:50] lazy loading thus only available locally right now [20:18:29] k [20:27:00] niedzielski: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/274848/ is ready to be merged [20:30:06] bearND: woo! [20:30:14] niedzielski: ty [20:57:19] bearND: should we deploy today? [20:57:54] mdholloway: i'm just going through your other patch Marko merged earlier. [20:59:29] mdholloway: ok, looks good. Let's deploy today. I can do it if you are busy. [21:00:10] mdholloway: unless you want to since you want to try your new git tagging script [21:01:22] mdholloway: is there some gpg setup needed? [21:01:25] bearND: either way fine with me. if you're at a good break point, then go for it. i think the section errors were discussing earlier are because of a bug in lead paragraph shifting, btw, but still looking into it. [21:03:03] bearND: i've actually used the script after the last couple of deploys (before it was merged). yes, you'll need to have a GPG signing key and configure it as user.signingkey for the repo [21:04:34] mdholloway: is that documented on the service wiki page? [21:04:45] bearND: sorry, not yet. will do. [21:38:13] mdholloway: deployment is done, but I have not run the tagging script. Would you run it when you update the documentation for it? [21:38:25] bearND: sure. [21:38:49] thank you [21:54:17] hey dbrant|brb when you get back want to chat? [22:03:31] mdholloway: delay the git tag. having to revert the deploy. see ops channel [22:04:05] bearND: ok, thanks for the heads-up [22:18:34] kaity_: ready now, if you like [22:18:52] dbrant: hangout or just chat? [22:19:05] kaity_: hangout! [22:21:02] bearND mdholloway dbrant: hello! things are looking fine for the beta. please check out the release notes when you can :) [22:34:39] niedzielski: release notes look good to me [22:34:48] mdholloway: thanks! [22:37:15] /quit [23:16:44] dbrant mdholloway|afk bearND: final call on release notes :) [23:26:55] niedzielski: notes lgtm! [23:27:41] 👍 [23:36:49] niedzielski: lgtm. i added a final note at the end of the froid discussion BTW [23:38:31] bearND: thanks! it's fine if they want to wait. i just want them to be aware of the change [23:39:49] k