[08:58:48] yo [09:36:26] phuedx: howdy [09:36:37] o/ mdholloway [09:47:50] phedenskog: you around? [09:53:05] dr0ptp4kt: are you really here or are you a bot? [09:54:52] phuedx: it's me. i mean, you're not supposed to have bots, right? right? [09:55:01] of course [09:55:06] no one here operates a bot [09:55:20] phuedx: and are you phuedx or phuedx's bot? [09:55:59] my bot's ai is so sophisticated that it renders that question irrelevant [09:56:12] that sounds like something a bot would say... [09:56:54] :) [12:29:45] dr0ptp4kt: here now [12:59:16] hey phedenskog i replied on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T143663, was hoping to talk with you in person, but figured i better just write it up. that said, how late you around today? wondering if we could talk on video [12:59:23] not right now...i need to mow the lawn [12:59:44] then get ready for the day and start the day. just was up really early getting a head start on things [13:00:35] yes I see, I'll get on that ticket asap and answer [13:00:58] sorry I was being unclear from that in the beginning will try to clearify [13:03:04] phedenskog: i revised my comment when i realized the description already said it was extreme mode and facebook article, btw [13:03:19] so if you see that in your email, but not in the comment, that's why :) [15:10:33] dbrant: o/ question for you: what do you think is the best approach to reducing the gradient opacity for the lead image? just multiply by a percentage at the end as i did in the initial patch, or adjust the GRADIENT_POWER input (or something else)? [15:11:14] both seemed to work when i was experimenting but i'm not sure if one way is more "correct" than another [15:12:23] mdholloway: a couple simple things: 1) lighten the color that you pass into getCubicGradient() [15:12:46] mdholloway: and 2) decrease the absolute height of the gradient overlay view. [15:13:42] dbrant: aha, cool, thanks! [15:18:55] phedenskog: so should i link you and jdlrobson up with my contact at opera? or you got it covered? [16:09:20] olliv: you happen to be around yet? [16:09:42] hi, I'm here [16:14:07] olliv: i just added you to https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T143170 . i think if we can't have the fundraising test moved a week or so later, then we'd probably want to work to initiate an it.wikipedia.org hovercards test 9/22. CKoerner_WMF i'm not sure if you think we'd want to discuss the hovercards test earlier. i guess we could discuss on phab, too [16:14:35] CKoerner_WMF: when i say 'discuss the hovercards test earlier' i mean the a/b test on it.wikipedia.org. [16:16:54] olliv: normally fundraising tests don't go too late into the year, because typically the major fundraising campaign work is in the december-ish timeframe [16:31:11] dr0ptp4kt: How would this change our plans of notifying the Italian community by early-mid Sept? [16:31:21] Or would it!? :) [16:33:34] CKoerner_WMF: not sure :) is 16-sep enough notice for 22-sep a/b test? or would it need to be a little earlier? [16:35:41] dr0ptp4kt: when is the fundraising test originally scheduled for? [16:39:22] olliv: it looks like presnetly online fundraising / fr-tech fundraising test would start it 4-october. for hungarian wikipedia, i think we had the hovercards a/b test up and running for about two weeks before the fundraising tests went into force. [16:53:26] A week would be really short. I have the message roughed-in and luckily have someone who is an active member of the it community willing to help review and translate. [16:53:58] Seddon and I wanted to share it with the Italian Wikimedia chapter as well before we posted. [16:54:07] * CKoerner_WMF thinking out loud [16:55:00] (said rough message): https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:CKoerner_(WMF)/Hovercard_A/B_test_Italian_Wikipedia_post [17:08:16] Let me noodle on this with Seddon for a minute. :) [17:35:14] bearND: coreyfloyd you guys coming? [17:38:24] dr0ptp4kt: omw [18:01:45] bearND: estimation [19:06:12] CKoerner_WMF: so, would it be possible to notify them the week before 16 -sep? [20:55:02] phuedx: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T143262#2587484 [22:00:38] jdlrobson: hey the history icon. is it new one i gave on beta? the stretching issue is still there :( do you think the svg fix didn't work [22:06:23] olliv: I think that would work. I have not yet connected with Seddon as he's my contact with the Italian chapter. [22:28:11] nzr: to answer for jon, yes the svg is the new one I think: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/306732/1/resources/skins.minerva.icons.images.variants/clock.svg [22:40:02] bmansurov is it on beta then?