[16:27:35] <dbrant>	 mdholloway: I can file a task for the change-prop issue (unless you're already typing it?)
[16:33:42] <mdholloway>	 dbrant: ah, no, i hadn't started yet, go for it!
[16:33:46] <dbrant>	 done
[17:41:48] <dbrant>	 niedzielski: mdholloway: bearND|afk: got a minute for batcave?
[17:42:08] <mdholloway>	 dbrant: one min to find headphones and i'll be there!
[17:42:27] <niedzielski>	 dbrant: be there in one min
[17:43:19] <mdholloway>	 ok i'm there
[18:04:06] <mdholloway>	 niedzielski: should i just combine those two patches or are you finding the separation helpful?
[18:04:49] <mdholloway>	 i managed to get rid of some of the duplicative boilerplate/cruft in the latest but the relevant changes are in the second half so it might be hard to follow.
[18:05:17] <niedzielski>	 mdholloway: checking it out now
[18:06:08] <niedzielski>	 mdholloway: i think your approach of making the boilerplate activity / fragment type stuff in the first patch was nice
[18:07:04] <niedzielski>	 mdholloway: if it's causing problems though, it won't be any trouble for me to view these patches merged together either
[18:08:01] <niedzielski>	 mdholloway: however the patch i was digging into in the meeting is actually this is older one: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/323177/
[18:09:02] <mdholloway>	 ah i see
[19:20:16] <HaeB>	 phuedx|afk: reinserted the version field as discussed: https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Beta_Features/Hovercards/Functionality&diff=2305664&oldid=2298069
[19:20:54] <HaeB>	 phuedx|afk: btw regarding the "cardType" addition, is this part of the rewrite or should i create a separate task for it?
[19:28:02] <phuedx|afk>	 HaeB: i can include it in the rewrite -- it's fairly easy to do
[19:29:49] <HaeB>	 phuedx|afk: cool - want me to extend the schema page on meta with a specification for the cardtype field, or do it yourself? (should be straighforward)
[19:30:59] <phuedx|afk>	 HaeB: "generic" and "specific" cool?
[19:31:59] <HaeB>	 phuedx|afk: yes, unless you can think of a better term than "generic" (expressing the notion that these cards are a bit deficient in some way ;)
[19:32:16] <phuedx|afk>	 HaeB: awesome!!1 and awesomer!!1
[19:33:59] <HaeB>	 😎 vs. 😖 
[19:38:21] <coreyfloyd>	 niedzielski: hey are you about to discus https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T148444
[19:39:12] <niedzielski>	 coreyfloyd: it's merged. is there anything left to do?
[19:39:34] <coreyfloyd>	 niedzielski: im not sure… i was just trying to understand the fixes and the issue
[19:40:05] <coreyfloyd>	 niedzielski: mind hanging out to explain it to me?
[19:40:11] <niedzielski>	 coreyfloyd: oh, well it was a feature to add the subject of each news headline to the most read content service response
[19:40:19] <niedzielski>	 coreyfloyd: sure
[19:40:38] <coreyfloyd>	 niedzielski: bat cave?
[21:08:57] <mdholloway>	 dbrant: mobrovac: the mobile-sections vs. mobile-sections-lead discrepancy is back again
[21:09:12] <mdholloway>	 https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/mobile-sections/Monogram_(company)
[21:09:20] <mdholloway>	 https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/mobile-sections-lead/Monogram_(company)