[04:55:40] <yuvipanda>	 Ironholds: HEY DO YOU WANT MY UNSUBSTANTIATED OPINION ABOUT GEOLOCATION THAT REPEATS WHAT SOMEONE ELSE ALREADY SAID BUT IN DIFFERENT WORDS?
[11:08:27] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 yuvipanda I would. :p
[11:08:34] <ToAruShiroiNeko>	 Get it out of your chest.
[14:55:54] <guillom>	 TAG, researchers.
[14:58:44] <halfak>	 G'morning guillom 
[14:58:47] <halfak>	 :) 
[15:00:49] <harej>	 hello guillaume
[15:01:23] <harej>	 i am being paid to surface metrics. what a wonderful job i have!
[15:02:55] <guillom>	 hey halfak & harej
[15:03:45] <guillom>	 "surfacing" always brings up the image of a submarine to my mind.
[15:08:04] <harej>	 yes. i am surfacing the great SS WikiProject
[15:08:38] <halfak>	 Why is it that quarry's json output is one gigantic json blob?
[15:08:57] * halfak grumbles
[15:18:46] <legoktm>	 halfak: why, you want it in XML instead? :P
[15:18:59] <halfak>	 No.  I want one row per JSON blob
[15:19:20] <halfak>	 Which is verbose and has overhead, but as far as I can tell, it's a common standard. 
[15:19:52] <halfak>	 It enables you to read the data one row at a time, sample with coreutils shuf, etc. 
[15:20:27] <halfak>	 Oh yes,.  Jq expects one row per JSON and a whole bunch of other logging utilities do too. 
[15:20:59] * halfak raised this with yuvipanda a long time ago
[15:21:03] <halfak>	 I guess I was overruled. 
[15:26:46] <yuvipanda>	 halfak: no I just haven't had the time 
[15:26:48] <yuvipanda>	 File a bug
[15:27:31] <halfak>	 yuvipanda, will do. 
[15:37:51] <sdesabbata>	 halfak +1 against all json output on one row
[15:37:57] <sdesabbata>	 :)
[15:38:17] <halfak>	 sdesabbata, one row per json or all on one row?
[15:38:29] <halfak>	 Oh!
[15:38:32] <sdesabbata>	 halfak: I vote for 1 element per row
[15:38:34] * halfak missed "against"
[15:38:39] <halfak>	 :) 
[15:38:58] <halfak>	 I'm waist deep in something if you want to file the bug :) 
[15:39:07] <halfak>	 See the link on the bottom of quarry. 
[15:39:09] <sdesabbata>	 halfak: otherwise it's also unusable with PigLatin
[15:39:55] <sdesabbata>	 let's see, maybe when I finished my current late evening project
[15:40:07] <sdesabbata>	 projects*
[15:40:17] <sdesabbata>	 1) Vis-à-Wik
[15:40:48] <sdesabbata>	 2) updating Template:Coordinates in Furlan Wikipedia
[15:41:00] <sdesabbata>	 :)
[15:41:36] <halfak>	 sdesabbata, are you planning to come to wikimania this year?
[15:42:33] <sdesabbata>	 Mexico City... I really doubt I can get that founded, plus timing is a bit complicated those days
[15:42:49] <sdesabbata>	 halfak: it's actually a real pity
[15:44:44] <halfak>	 sdesabbata, maybe next year.  You should consider submitting a talk proposal to show off your wiki tools :) 
[15:45:05] <sdesabbata>	 halfak: maybe I can catch the 2016 in Italy
[15:45:09] <halfak>	 Research & technical talks are generally well received. 
[15:45:12] <halfak>	 Indeed :) 
[15:45:26] <sdesabbata>	 I will start planning that
[15:45:42] <sdesabbata>	 Is Iolanda Pensa organising Wikimenia 2016?
[15:46:27] <wikibugs>	 10Quarry: JSON output should be one row per JSON blob - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T98492#1269220 (10Halfak) 3NEW
[15:48:43] <halfak>	 sdesabbata, not sure. 
[17:49:20] <Nemo_bis>	 Sí
[17:51:07] <Ironholds>	 morning
[17:51:28] <halfak>	 o/ 
[19:44:30] <guillom>	 halfak: Ironholds: Would you guys hate me until the end of time if I nominated you to provide feedback for me for the annual reviews? My "team" for 2014-2015 has basically been "Erik"  but that alone isn't going to cut it for HR. We've interacted a bit on a few projects so I thought you'd be good choices (plus, I know I can count on you both being honest :p)
[19:44:45] <Ironholds>	 guillom, not in the slightest
[19:45:00] <halfak>	 guillom, rock on
[19:45:08] <halfak>	 :) 
[20:02:17] <guillom>	 halfak: Ironholds: Did you see my message above? It's not urgent but I got disconnected right afterwards so I'm not sure it went through.
[20:02:27] <Ironholds>	 guillom, yes, we all said "that's cool!"
[20:02:41] <guillom>	 Ironholds: Ah! Thanks; I hadn't seen that :)
[20:02:46] <halfak>	 :) 
[20:02:54] * guillom nominates away.
[20:03:05] * halfak just saw the email that I need to keep track of nominations.
[20:03:08] <halfak>	 uh oh.  
[20:04:18] <Deskana>	 halfak: The great email search has already begun, for me. :-)
[20:04:22] <Deskana>	 Hope I don't forget anyone!
[20:04:35] * guillom has received zero nominations so far and doesn't really expect it to change.
[20:04:45] <harej>	 nominations for what?
[20:04:53] <guillom>	 harej: annual reviews
[20:04:55] <halfak>	 guillom has more free time then :) 
[20:05:03] <halfak>	 Deskana, but IRC :( 
[20:05:13] <Deskana>	 Yep :(
[20:05:26] <halfak>	 I wonder what kind of black hole our nominations go into. 
[20:05:50] <halfak>	 I suppose the kind where email reminders can never make it out. 
[20:07:38] <Ironholds>	 guillom, me too
[20:07:55] <guillom>	 Ironholds: about the zero?
[20:08:05] <Ironholds>	 yup
[20:08:12] <guillom>	 Ironholds: Well, you'll get mine!
[20:08:17] <Ironholds>	 indeed!
[20:08:25] <Ironholds>	 and then I'll review people anyway whether they want it or not
[20:08:30] <guillom>	 :D
[20:08:45] <guillom>	 That is actually a really awesome idea.
[20:16:45] <guillom>	 Wait, I'm confused now. So when you "nominate" people in the form, that doesn't actually do anything?
[20:17:09] <guillom>	 Meh.
[20:25:54] <halfak>	 guillom, I think that is right. 
[20:26:21] <guillom>	 Yeah, I was confused a bit at first.
[20:30:39] <halfak>	 hey Nettrom, any chance you want to squash today?
[20:30:48] <harej>	 hi Nettrom!!
[20:30:54] <halfak>	 I just had a big meeting get moved. 
[20:31:01] <Nettrom>	 hello
[20:31:11] <Nettrom>	 darn, didn't bring my squash gear today :)
[20:31:15] <Nettrom>	 oops, wrong smiley too
[20:31:18] <Nettrom>	 :(
[20:31:24] <Nettrom>	 hey harej 
[20:31:54] <halfak>	 Bummer.  Oh well.  
[20:31:59] <halfak>	 I'll get it on your calendar next time. 
[20:34:48] <Nettrom>	 yeah, that should work