[14:41:10] 10Quarry: Unicode in query results in strange behavior - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T71224#1429869 (10Halfak) 5Open>3Resolved [14:41:18] 10Quarry: Unicode in query results in strange behavior - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T71224#742694 (10Halfak) Yup. Works for me now. [14:53:29] Hello, researchers. [14:55:38] o/ guillom [14:56:13] hey halfak. How was your week-end? Patriotic? [14:56:38] Indeed. Fireworks and BBQs [14:56:54] More just playing around with my camping stuff than actual BBQ. [15:16:41] halfak a bbq huh? marshmellows? [15:17:43] Yup! Claimed master level in getting the coals hot and distributed and then using them to produce lightly browned marshmallow delights. [15:19:08] woha [15:19:30] halfak: I had fun watching people blow up fireworks in the middle of a city [15:19:49] distributed using probabality distribution? [15:19:55] Professionals or amateurs? [15:20:10] harej, ^ [15:20:50] Amateurs. [15:22:56] I read that up to "I had fun watching people blow up" part and my eyes opened. [15:23:10] context. :D [15:25:13] harej, ooh! So it was a probabilistic game of "that firework probably won't come towards me." [15:25:39] Uhh, I had to duck a couple of times. [15:25:48] More like a probabilistic game of "will we burn down the school?" [15:26:51] The show was put on by this random family in the neighborhood. They had a setup in the middle of the street and the guy managing everything seemed to know what he was doing. [15:27:03] It was the stupid white people fucking around that posed the most danger. [15:27:30] Everything turned out fine. [15:27:36] Why does the color of the stupid people's skin have anything to do with it? [15:27:47] Good point. [15:29:23] Incidentally, the new WikiProject design is now online. Here it is in action: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Technology [15:29:24] halfak I think its the color of the fireworks we have to worry about [15:29:45] My approach renders the entire page through a Lua module, invoking subpages through the module. [15:44:11] harej, I'm happy to have a more socially acceptable Wikiproject to demo :) [15:44:24] More socially acceptable than WikiProject Women in Technology? [15:44:25] * halfak got a couple weird looks for showing off worklists on WikiProject Cannabis [15:44:30] Ah. [15:44:35] hhe [15:44:38] heh, too [15:45:01] Women in Technology is a weird case because as a half-set up WikiProject, it does not have an associated list of articles. Meaning most of the functionality does not work. [15:45:13] The other demos will be Ghana, Cognitive Science, Evolutionary Biology, and Hampshire. [15:45:27] Nothing against WikiProject Cannabis though. [15:45:44] There's just some topics where people have to ask why that one was chosen :D [15:46:19] 1) The founder of WikiProject Cannabis is a friend of mine and I know he'll sign off on anything I do. 2) Popular topic in the news; it's a subject that attracts a lot of interest. 3) Weed is cool [15:46:36] ^ +1 [19:24:21] halfak: Are you interested in anecdotal examples of where the wp10 model gets it wrong? (i.e. if it predicts an FA status with 0.5, when the article is actually C-rated) [19:25:00] ("No" is a perfectly valid answer.) [19:25:33] Yes. Not sure how to process them yet. [19:25:41] Also, when was that C rating added to the article? [19:25:49] Do you believe it is still a C? [19:25:56] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bee&oldid=669767504 [19:26:04] Ah, good point. haven't checked the date of the rating. [19:26:19] That doesn't look like a C [19:26:49] I'm not very familiar with enwp's scale; I would have said B for the current state. [19:27:02] or maybe GA [19:27:31] Could be that the size of the article and count of references is the reason for the mis-classification. [19:27:57] I think that getting WP Insects in here to re-rate and then comparing to the model would be most useful. [19:28:12] Or Agriculture / Beekeeping [19:28:37] I'll ask them. [19:28:47] Thanks :) [19:29:02] :) Don't tell them what the prediction was -- just that the model thinks the current assessment should be updated. [19:29:09] Sure :) [19:29:30] Are people really still believing in WP1.0 ? [19:29:39] We buried that one, like, 6 years ago. [19:29:52] Ugh, inactive WikiProject talk pages :/ [19:30:22] * guillom puts this on backburner. [19:31:27] Nemo_bis, more using old data from it to predict quality classes. [19:31:46] Also it seems that WikiProject Medicine and History are still using them to organize work. [21:21:31] ahoy nettrom [21:55:56] harej: hiya! was in a meeting, about to head out again... wanted to have time to bugfix my WikiProject Suggestbot code today, but didn't get around to it... but I'm at the point where it's bugfixing :) [21:56:14] So I have come up with output formatting for you [21:56:26] Would you like it now or later? [21:57:04] later would be great, I really gotta go :( [21:58:56] * Nettrom waves