[17:13:09] Happy Saturday, researchers. [17:15:58] not really [17:16:09] turns out my identity may have been one of the ones yoinked from T-Mobile during that Experia theft [17:17:17] Ironholds, boo! That's rough [17:17:23] o/ guillom [17:17:42] Ironholds: :( [17:26:41] yeah, it's gonna be a fun weekend [18:28:16] guillom: not sure if you do pywikibot stuff, but thought you might be interested in https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/quarry-for-pwb-scripts [18:29:12] YuviPanda: Interesting idea! [18:30:12] I use PWB occasionally; although it's mostly on private wikis. [18:30:24] right [18:30:25] (because public wikis have enough bot owners) [18:30:28] heh [18:30:36] these are for one-off runs of replace.py or things like that [18:30:49] I think there'll be more people doing it if they didn't have to deal with the setup and what not [18:31:21] Agreed. [18:31:25] and I'd like to think people who wouldn't be doing a lot of SQL queries are doing more because of quarry [18:31:31] and I hope the same thing happens here too [18:31:54] But then again, SQL queries are passive; PWB is active (i.e. it's mostly for editing). [18:32:05] right [18:32:10] So there might be policy considerations. [18:32:28] guillom: yeah, but this doesn't let you do anything you can't do right now by just installing pwb locally on your computer [18:32:36] True. [18:33:00] * guillom is cooking lunch at the same time, so brain resources are not 100% allocated to this discussion :p [18:33:04] heh :) [18:33:10] that reminds me I should probably eat something... [19:17:39] halfak: http://blog.light42.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/clark.pdf very interesting paper