[15:06:08] <leila>	 hey schana. :)
[15:06:20] <leila>	 who is this question directed to, schana? https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T129568 
[15:06:49] <schana>	 future me :)
[15:54:45] <ori>	 schana: could I ask you to create a task for the work you've embarked on to package dependencies as wheels?
[16:33:27] <wikibugs>	 10Quarry: it would be useful to run the same Quarry query conveniently in several database - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95582#2667746 (10Milimetric) @Quiddity, we're very close to allowing this kind of query in Hadoop, which you've worked with before, right?  Grab me and I'll show you what we're working...
[17:41:03] <apergos>	 hey any ores folks in here?
[17:41:36] <halfak>	 o/
[17:41:43] <apergos>	 there you are
[17:41:57] <apergos>	 hey I am noticing in the logs some funky stuff, can you tell me if it's ok or not ok?
[17:42:04] <halfak>	 Sure!
[17:42:31] <apergos>	 a bunch of these seeming to start an hour ago:
[17:42:33] <apergos>	 (08:38:12 μμ) apergos: lots of  Sep 25 16:34:18 scb1001 celery[30747]: [2016-09-25 16:34:18,198: WARNING/Worker-14] /srv/deployment/ores/venv/lib/python3.4/site-packages/celery/result.py:45: R
[17:42:33] <apergos>	 (08:38:12 μμ) apergos: untimeWarning: Never call result.get() within a task!
[17:42:40] <apergos>	 with a bunch more exception related crap
[17:42:42] <apergos>	 and then also
[17:42:54] <halfak>	 Those are OK.  We need to silence that
[17:42:54] <apergos>	 (08:38:58 μμ) apergos: Sep 25 16:37:17 scb1001 celery[30747]: [2016-09-25 16:37:17,695: ERROR/MainProcess] Task ores.scoring_systems.celery_queue._lookup_score_in_map[enwiki:reverted:
[17:42:54] <apergos>	 (08:38:58 μμ) apergos: 0.1.2:741120316] raised unexpected: TimeoutError('The operation timed out.',)
[17:42:58] <apergos>	 a bunch of these 
[17:43:08] <halfak>	 That's expected.  We shouldn't have that in the log though.  Let me file some tasks. 
[17:43:13] <apergos>	 ok cool
[17:43:19] <apergos>	 that will make these logs smaller also
[17:43:31] <halfak>	 Yeah.  We just switch from INFO to WARNING
[17:45:19] <halfak>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T146681
[17:45:36] <halfak>	 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T146680
[17:45:42] <halfak>	 Thanks apergos 
[17:45:51] <apergos>	 thank you
[20:40:10] <halfak>	 o/
[21:02:47] <halfak>	 guillom, can you remind me where I can read about the French Wikipedia article quality assessment rating scale?
[21:03:05] <guillom>	 sure; gimme a sec
[21:03:30] <guillom>	 halfak: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projet:%C3%89valuation
[21:04:10] <halfak>	 Thanks!
[21:07:17] <guillom>	 Sure :)
[21:09:37] * halfak is building a monthly article quality dataset for frwiki
[21:09:44] <halfak>	 I just finished building one for enwiki
[21:09:55] <halfak>	 It's gonna be really cool :) 
[21:10:25] <halfak>	 I'm personally excited to see how the growth in quality changed focus to different subject areas over time
[21:14:39] <halfak>	 And how the efficiency of adding "productive words" changed
[21:21:48] <wikibugs>	 10Quarry: it would be useful to run the same Quarry query conveniently in several database - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95582#2668912 (10yuvipanda) Hadoop isn't public though, so not the same thing :) You can do similar things via tool labs now too.
[21:33:00] <wikibugs>	 10Quarry: it would be useful to run the same Quarry query conveniently in several database - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T95582#1195035 (10matmarex) You can fairly easily turn a query for a single wiki into a query over all wikis. It's a bit of boring work though. The pattern goes like this:  ```lang=sql s...
[23:35:06] <quiddity>	 Hi, I'm looking for research info on "collapsible sections". IIRC there was some recent research (perhaps New Readers?) that touched on this UI aspect, I think in relation to mobile. It might have been related to metrics around reading-time (i.e. spending less time on mobile articles when the sections were collapsed, IIRC). Anyone know what I'm talking about? (ping AbbeyRipstra justincase). Thanks!