[15:06:38] <guillom>	 _o/
[15:07:22] <apergos>	 _o\
[15:07:39] <Emufarmers>	 -o-
[15:34:53] <halfak>	 \o/
[15:46:06] <Nemo_bis>	 _o_
[16:32:29] <kjschiroo>	 halfak, or others of the revscoring crew. Is the example you have in the readme supposed to work out of the box? https://github.com/wiki-ai/revscoring/blob/master/demo_load_model.py
[16:40:32] <halfak>	 kjschiroo, looks like it's broken.  Check out the ipython instead. 
[16:40:42] <halfak>	 https://github.com/wiki-ai/revscoring/blob/master/ipython/feature_engineering.ipynb
[16:40:50] <halfak>	 Oh!  Looks like we don't load a model there. 
[16:40:57] <halfak>	 I can fix the example quick. 
[17:41:19] <kjschiroo>	 halfak, thanks
[17:46:33] * halfak gets to the fixing
[18:47:03] <pajz>	 Does anyone remember the research/study that tried to measure the persistence of content additions over time? (I found <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Content_persistence> but that doesn't seem to report results.)
[18:50:37] <Nemo_bis>	 pajz: did the research/study you have in mind report results?
[18:52:23] <pajz>	 yeah, I think it was presented quite some time ago at a metrics/activities meeting or a research showcase
[18:55:13] <halfak>	 Hey pajz.  That was mine.  
[18:55:16] <halfak>	 I'll get some links for oyu
[18:56:02] <halfak>	 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Measuring_edit_productivity
[18:56:53] <halfak>	 The talk and slides are linked from here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Research/Showcase#January_2016
[18:58:00] <halfak>	 Most of the code for generating this is documented here: http://pythonhosted.org/mwpersistence/
[19:02:24] <pajz>	 thanks, as always
[21:07:56] * guillom watches J-Mo|away spamming his watchlist on Meta.
[21:08:12] <J-Mo|away>	 ;)
[21:21:31] <DarTar>	 can I say how much I hate ICWSM/AAAI for not supporting DOIs :-(