[13:32:10] o/ [13:32:51] hey HaeB. Are you around? Looks like you're not away, but it's super early in PT. [13:33:07] I was wondering if you knew when the next research newsletter might run. [14:11:19] Looks like Ed17 is going to try to get the next issue out. [14:11:23] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom [15:13:36] halfak: yes, saw that [15:15:27] ...i had been envisaging to publish it separately this week, but that would of course be preferabl [15:24:00] I'm thinking I'll bother Ed17 to find out how serious he is at some point today. [15:24:21] * halfak really wants to get his politically hazardous paper review out there. [16:02:49] what paper is that, halfak? [18:18:26] Showcase will start in 12 minutes [18:29:08] Hey folks. We're just about to kick things off. [18:31:36] Stream should be live [18:31:42] working :) [18:31:46] great ! [18:31:47] :) [18:31:48] * lzia claps for Research Showcase. [18:31:55] Ping me with questions [18:32:28] halfak is Shilad frozen for you? [18:32:35] Noppe [18:32:42] I can hear him, but his video is frozen. [18:32:49] k. long as it's just me :) [18:32:54] Oh Maybe he just hasn't started his slide deck [18:33:01] Hmmm yeah it is frozen [18:33:04] yeah, I was wondering the same thing [18:33:19] (Reminder that you/we can adjust the default video quality with the cog icon, which sometimes auto-adjusts to 240) [18:33:30] I saw mouse movement, video is fine. :) [18:33:37] good deal [18:33:49] halfak: it may be worth interrupting and asking Shilad to reshare his screen. [18:33:53] I messaged shilad to tell him we're not seeing things. [18:34:20] thanks halfak! [18:34:37] I don't think he's talking through his first few slides. [18:34:50] BTW: https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fcommons.wikimedia.org%2Fwiki%2FFile%3AShilad_Sen%2C_Wikimedia_Research_Showcase%2C_April_2017.pdf&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHRrCnm0J-4x6MAtxhAplMEWXrbNQ [18:34:54] Darn you google [18:35:01] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shilad_Sen,_Wikimedia_Research_Showcase,_April_2017.pdf [18:35:02] halfak: interrupt and ask for resharing. [18:35:07] it's unfortunate, it's hard to follow. [18:36:41] was workign in testing! [18:36:51] uhu. it happens. don't worry. [18:37:20] thanks, halfak. [18:38:06] I had no idea bhecht was a macalester grad [18:38:13] :P [18:38:32] http://atlasify.northwestern.edu/ [18:39:56] http://matt.might.net/articles/crapl/ [18:40:40] http://shilad.github.io/wikibrain/ [18:44:02] lzia, some interesting stuff for recsys, right? [18:46:18] paying very careful attention, halfak. :) [18:46:44] I've been trying hard to get Wikibrain on Wikimedia infra so we can start playing around with it too :D [18:47:02] :) [18:47:28] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/WikiBrainTools [18:47:50] https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T161554 [18:47:51] halfak: question for when there is question time. How is the mapping between a Wikipedia article and categories done? [18:48:01] * halfak adds all the relevant links to the backchannel. [18:48:05] lzia, got it [18:51:06] One of my fav. psych articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overjustification_effect [18:52:28] paper Shilad is talking about now: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/be0a/e35c4cf47c4ce543481f888bde8a4cfe2cd1.pdf [18:52:40] http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2675285 [18:53:39] I nominate this for best visualization of the year. Look at Africa! [18:55:31] This one: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Shilad_Sen,_Wikimedia_Research_Showcase,_April_2017.pdf&page=38 [18:56:56] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobler%27s_first_law_of_geography [18:57:11] yay Tobler! [18:58:18] https://movielens.org/ [18:58:25] https://grouplens.org/datasets/movielens/ [19:00:10] great spatialisation [19:01:14] We're gonna be giving that a hug of death, I'm sure. [19:01:14] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_effect [19:05:08] halfak: you may want to share https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Navigation_Vectors with Shilad afterwards, in the context of word2vec. [19:05:23] lzia, I think he's just about to talk about it :D [19:05:28] He was working with ellery on it [19:05:32] Yup. here's we go [19:05:32] :D [19:05:36] ok. :) [19:06:00] (there is some delay.;) [19:07:01] question for Shilad: how did they compare word2vec vs navigation vectors? [19:07:27] just in terms of accuracy, or also a user study? [19:08:34] halfak: I should switch to another meeting. I'll check the YouTube link for the answer to my question if you get a chance to ask it. Thank you! [19:08:47] OK! [19:08:50] J-Mo, got it [19:08:57] ty [19:09:28] A question for later: is there any fundamental difference between a cartograph and a network visualisation based on Force Atlas algorithm or similar network layouts? [19:10:07] Taha, got it [19:12:34] \o/ [19:12:43] https://figshare.com/articles/Monthly_Wikipedia_article_quality_predictions/3859800 [19:13:19] \o/ [19:14:51] I guessed MILHIST would be related to what he was about to say… same thing we found in our 2015 paper [19:15:24] Warncke-Wang, M., Ranjan, V., Terveen, L. G., & Hecht, B. (2015, April). Misalignment Between Supply and Demand of Quality Content in Peer Production Communities. In ICWSM (pp. 493-502). http://www.brenthecht.com/publications/wikipedia_supplydemandquality_icwsm2015.pdf [19:16:05] also https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Research/Showcase#September_2015 [19:16:39] Wrapping up. Questions! [19:17:00] grar [19:17:10] I missed the showcase, was busy merging/deploying [19:18:08] switchover has been rough today :S [19:18:40] J-Mo, feel free to ask your own question [19:18:41] :) [19:18:44] You're up next [19:19:01] I can ask too if you like :D [19:19:03] I will. Lot of background noise here, but I can ask quick and then re-mute [19:19:16] cool [19:19:54] really cool! that visualization of quality vs popularity for a topic cluster would be a great basis for an article finder designed to help people (like professors running Wikipedia assignments) to find high-impact low-quality articles to work on. [19:19:56] J-Mo, audio was very rough. [19:20:06] yeah, I was afraid of that [19:20:08] I was actually in dumpsland but it was rought there too [19:20:19] anyways: slide deck? video? since some of us suck [19:20:19] ragesoss, right :DDDD [19:20:29] No question, but oodles of appreciation. New ways to explore topics, and to add layers of metadata, is near the top of my wishlist. [19:20:31] Video is in topic [19:20:36] sweet [19:20:37] thx [19:20:39] apergos, https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Research/Showcase#April_2017 [19:20:41] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shilad_Sen,_Wikimedia_Research_Showcase,_April_2017.pdf [19:20:50] * halfak keeps the wiki up to date [19:21:02] I'm going to follow up with Shilad re: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Evaluating_RelatedArticles_recommendations [19:22:56] Any more Qs? I'm gonna start asking my own >:) [19:23:35] I'd be curious to hear him talk about the possibility of explaining the distances between points in Cartograph to users [19:24:09] i.e. why are two points close by [19:24:24] isaacj, got it [19:25:21] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_rank [19:27:20] thanks! [19:27:22] Relevant: Vig, J., Sen, S., & Riedl, J. (2009, February). Tagsplanations: explaining recommendations using tags. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 47-56). ACM. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bcb8/1d41eabebf44a98b37673be66bf5b5bae13e.pdf [19:28:30] the project that Aaron mentioned that we’re working on is here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Automated_classification_of_article_importance and we have a draft lit. review of related works on https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Studies_of_Importance [19:30:47] thanks, interesting. [19:30:51] Thanks Shilad, and thanks halfak for organizing! [19:32:07] \o/ Thanks for attending! [19:33:21] * halfak wipes brow. Good show. [20:56:18] halfak: planning any progress on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T162297 ? [20:56:54] matanya, I honestly haven't spent time on it since we last talked. :( [20:56:59] I'm really sorry to say that. [20:57:20] fair enough, you are a busy person [21:00:35] matanya, I think a good next step would be to write up a proposal to fund a research project into steward workload and the risk of not managing steward tasks well. [21:00:51] I'd like to find the right grad student to advise in taking measurements. [21:01:17] ok, what length kind of proposal ? FDC like ? [21:02:49] Project grant [21:03:02] ok [21:14:23] (Sorry jumped into a meeting)