[00:35:36] halfak: is research.wikimedia a wiki or something else? [14:24:21] halfak: o/ Was curious if the item quality predictions dataset you were creating is ready? Thanks [16:00:14] hall1467, [16:00:21] will get that hosted today [16:00:23] Sorry for the delay [16:00:32] Thanks! No worries [16:03:38] hey schana. Dario may join a few min late. Let's start at 10 past. [16:03:48] ok lzia [17:28:25] nettrom we decided to declare victory [17:28:33] I pasted the link in the pad [17:28:33] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Autoconfirmed_trial_experiment [17:28:35] Nettrom: ^^ [17:28:50] sounds good, I had too many tabs open and accidentally closed the hangout one [17:28:52] sorry :D [17:28:57] but yeah, that’s the page [17:29:09] lol I do that all of the time [17:29:14] thanks for the insights everyone, tremendously helpful! :) [17:45:25] halfak: is research.wikimedia.org going to be a wiki, or some other kind of website? [18:01:00] harej: static website [18:01:10] ah, okay [18:01:15] what will come of the research pages on meta? [18:01:56] they stay. this site will primarily serve as a jumping-off-point for finding research-relevant stuff, which includes links to the research index [18:02:14] in other words, we're trying not to duplicate content [18:02:18] got it [18:02:29] (or self-deport from Meta, I gather) [18:04:18] it mostly comes down to audience and expectations: external researcher, media outlets etc. who want to learn more about research activities at WMF expect to be able to find a place that has all the information relevant to the team/activity, and they probably expect it to look a certain way (not like Meta) [18:04:45] that is a very reasonable proposition [18:05:43] good to hear. we expect some pushback (or at least snark) from some folks, but ultimately I don't think that anyone who sees the final site will consider it controversial [18:28:14] I expect pushback to be minimal if you're not, for instance, creating your own wiki [22:19:16] J-Mo: what are your thoughts on me creating a next gen formwizard? [22:19:45] one that makes better use of the stuff built into mediawiki these days [22:19:51] and potentially a nice UI for building forms [22:21:44] hey there harej. That would be great! I'm sure that a lot of the Grant workflows would benefit from an improved wizard. I fully support this idea. Let me know if you want to chat about ideas, or if you have questions. You can track your work on the (underutilized) Phabricator project, if you like: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/view/1496/ [22:22:03] underutilized is right :P [22:26:48] J-Mo: with respect to implementation, would it be fine if I made this a totally separate gadget and then, over time, switched things over to the new system? This I think would create the least disruption [22:36:30] J-Mo: also, is there a particular reason why it's broken up into formWizard and formWizard-core? [22:37:03] my guess is that it's to lighten the amount of code that needs to be loaded by every page, but you may have another idea [22:58:27] harej: yep, that's the reason. and yes, totally fine to make a new gadget. [22:58:51] hmm, think it would be good to do that on the Wikimedia Resource Center gadget as well?