[00:55:46] Hey leila. Were you looking for me yesterday? [01:03:03] hey guillom. Yes. Yes. I wanted to see if you have a favorite landing page somewhere on meta that is organizable/readable for an audience that want to get an overview of a project without going too much in details (at least first). [01:03:31] I like the strategic direction page (the tabs in that page have some potential for what I have in mind), but I'd love it if the visuals are much stronger. :) [01:03:52] Ah I was going to paste that link :D [01:04:01] :P [01:04:09] By visuals you mean the icons? [01:05:28] I guess I have to be more specific. ;) I mean: a stronger brand/identity for the page. This reflects itself in the colors used (in icons, tabs, etc.) but also in the way content is organized. [01:05:52] Other examples I can think of are https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Resource_Center and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Start [01:06:06] !!!! [01:06:49] And the tabs that connect the Tech pages, like Tech News, Tech forum, etc (although some are obsolete): https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News [01:06:53] interesting, guillom. I hadn't seen these pages. thanks. [01:07:21] harej: do you have an IRC alert on the WRC link? :p [01:07:28] no I just saw it [01:07:31] :D [01:07:57] If you're interested in tab-based navigation on meta there's https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Portal_navigation [01:08:09] which allows for a significant degree of customization [01:08:38] * leila digs [01:11:46] thank you both. for context: I'm trying to bring some sanity to all the pages about knowledge gap related research, step by step, and I still need to wrap my head around how to do that. These are really helpful links. One day, quiddity will be proud of me. :D [01:12:47] <3 [01:13:03] (already/always. But yes!) [01:13:19] (;) [01:15:39] btw, is phabricator down only for me? [01:17:02] nevermind. back. [12:29:56] halfak: o/ my github username is kodchi [18:16:05] lzia: Another page for your collection: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Learning_and_Evaluation/L&E_Workshop_Kits/Storytelling [18:32:11] neilpquinn: good point about the spectre/meltdown mitigations, we considered that too, but that quantization issue already occurred in october/november (and doesn't look much different for the data from after these fixes) [19:34:32] HaeB: yeah, I knew that the mitigations happened after the A/B tests, but I was thinking that perhaps it was some similar security precaution. But since the mitigations didn't affect the data much, that probably suggests it not a security precaution. Anyway, y'all have clearly already thought about this much more than me :)