[15:06:14] Hi channel :D [15:33:44] welcome back! [16:55:05] dsaez: o/ [16:55:08] dsaez: welcome back. [16:55:13] * leila waves to the channel [16:55:23] hi leila [16:56:46] dsaez: are you feeling refreshed? and ready to fight the good fight? ;) [16:57:31] sure, I've read two books about deep learning during holidays, now I want problems to be solved :D [18:30:53] I'll be there in 5,sorry [18:41:56] bmansurov: r u around today? [19:00:12] Pchelolo: bmansurov is not around, he’s on vacation [19:00:33] you can ping us (me/leila) for anything that’s time sensitive [19:01:05] This just in via Slate https://slate.com/technology/2018/12/wikipedia-nuclear-option-administrators-unself-banning.html [19:01:25] DarTar: thank you, but I don't think it's time sensitive - I wanted to deploy all Bahas updates for recommendation service to fix it, but seems it's not happening.. [19:02:04] Pchelolo: he mentioned they would be deployed today indeed [19:02:22] I was unsure if there was anything you guys needed on his end [19:02:46] Ideally we shouldn't have had anything, but some tests are failing.. [19:04:22] Pchelolo: got it, unless this is something leila can help with as the program owner for this work, I’m afraid we’ll need to wait until Baha is back [19:04:37] actually, I know how to fix it :) [19:04:48] oh neat — thanks for your help btw, appreciated [20:42:29] isaacj: Florian and I talked just now. He's going to do one pass over the /Code page and give you feedback in the Discussion page and/or edit directly. [20:43:05] leila: thanks and excellent - both comments / editing is quite welcome! [20:43:07] isaacj: he said that one thing that he can think of off-the-top of his head is feature extractions related to the articles: topic modeling, ... [20:43:22] ahh good point, i'll go dig up that code [20:43:26] isaacj: I asked him to do this before the end of the week, the sooner the better, so we can wrap it up. [20:43:47] :thumbs up: [20:43:55] isaacj: ok. then let me know if you need my help somewhere. And, just FYI, we created a long list of todos for Florian:https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Characterizing_Wikipedia_Reader_Behaviour/Data?venotify=created [20:44:24] isaacj: the ambitious plan is to do that by Thursday for us to have time to communicate on wikimedia-l before we sign off on Friday. It's quite ambitious. let's see. ;) [20:44:56] gilles: o/ [20:45:29] gilles: did you make the following change because the survey you had in mind was going to run on Wikimedia? https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Schema%3AQuickSurveysResponses&type=revision&diff=18397510&oldid=17872290 [20:45:59] gilles: I'm asking as the field removed (SurveyInstanceToken) was the field that would allow us to talk with external surveys such as Google Forms. [20:46:29] J-Mo: did you do tests with QuickSurveys to see if you receive responses in the Google Form? [20:46:40] leila: wooh, yes indeed. getting the next survey email out and data release email out would be quite satisfying [20:47:00] leila: this is to unify that column name, which is found in several schemas [20:47:14] and it's the new canonical name for that piece of data in JS [20:47:26] it's Qualtrics, but yes. The responses are recorded, and the unique token is passed and stored correctly. [20:47:45] gilles, J-Mo: thanks. [20:47:50] isaacj: see above. [20:47:56] I wasn't aware it was doing some magic thanks to its name? the new column stores the same thing as beofre [20:48:32] gilles: haha. ;) I don't think the name change would matter. at least J-Mo is confirming that they did receive responses in Qualtrics which is great. [20:48:41] ok, great [20:49:59] yes, thanks for the context