[00:40:06] 10Quarry: Letter G should fit in box for title - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216581 (10Zoranzoki21) [00:44:10] 10Quarry: Letter G should fit in box for title - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216581 (10Zoranzoki21) [01:04:49] 10Quarry, 10User-Zoranzoki21: Letter G should fit in box for title - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216581 (10Zoranzoki21) a:03Zoranzoki21 [08:02:15] 10Quarry: Letter G should fit in box for title - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216581 (10Zoranzoki21) a:05Zoranzoki21→03None Oh, what I clicked :) [09:15:05] 10Quarry: Letter G should fit in box for title - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216581 (10Aklapper) 05Open→03Stalled I do not know what this bug report is about, what "box for title" and where to see a letter G. In general, please be way more specific and always read and follow https://www.mediawiki.org... [09:36:20] 10Quarry: Letter G should fit in box for title - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216581 (10Zoranzoki21) 05Stalled→03Open a:03Zoranzoki21 >>! In T216581#4967910, @Aklapper wrote: > I do not know what this bug report is about, what "box for title" and where to see a letter G. > > In general, please be wa... [09:43:02] 10Quarry: Letter G should fit in box for title - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216581 (10Zoranzoki21) | Before | After | {F28250591} | {F28250593} [09:58:53] 10Quarry, 10Patch-For-Review: Letter g cut off at bottom in #title - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216581 (10Aklapper) [10:00:05] 10Quarry, 10Patch-For-Review: Letter g cut off at bottom in #title - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216581 (10Aklapper) Problem does not happen in Firefox 65 on Fedora29. (For future reference, please include browser information when filing CSS issues - thanks!) [13:29:50] Is anyone using wikibugs messages about Quarry above? I've requested it to be disabled in this channel: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T76467#4968420. [16:19:37] 10Quarry, 10Patch-For-Review: Letter g cut off at bottom in #title - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T216581 (10zhuyifei1999) This seems relevant to Google Chrome (and possibly other Chromium-based). Reproduced on Google Chrome 72.0.3626.109 (too lazy to compile Chromium just for this ticket) on Gentoo. Does... [16:32:18] dsaez, just had a chance to scan that master's thesis. Do you have time for me to ask you a few questions? [17:43:33] 10Quarry, 10Wikibugs: Quarry -> #wikimedia-research & #wikimedia-labs - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T76467 (10Framawiki) [17:44:22] 10Quarry, 10Wikibugs: Quarry -> #wikimedia-research & #wikimedia-labs - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T76467 (10bmansurov) @Legoktm thanks for the reminder. I should not have been lazy. Thanks for the patch. [19:15:36] thanks, Baha! [19:26:19] bmansurov can you join the hangout? You can keep camera off [19:26:32] J-Mo1: yes a sec [19:26:43] perfect [19:31:46] Hey everyone, please send your questions to me, I'll read them aloud in the hangout meeting. [19:46:51] bmansurov: the bacteria seems to suggest that scientific images tends to be shared by more language. Did the authors look at the subjects/topics where images are more "multilingual"? [19:47:18] miriam_: noted [19:48:14] bmansurov: I think she is replying already :) [19:48:22] ok [19:49:12] interesting re the science observation just shared. [19:49:41] bmansurov then another question: [19:49:53] how can image analysis/computer vision help improving this work? [19:50:00] (sorry that's expected) [19:50:16] * leila claps for the speaker [19:50:47] whatsincommons.info/icwsm [19:51:11] bmansurov: ok let me formulate it better: do you see any way in which computer vision or image analysis can improving with this work? [19:51:30] I think that there is question from Peter Meyer in the Google chat. [19:59:00] subbu|shovelling: I hope while you're listening to research showcase. ;) [20:20:02] My attention has been divided among conversations so I apologize if my question was already answered. Did the research test whether users who have made no edits to articles or article talk pages may have had a goal in mind when they registered, and whether presenting them with a questionnaire may have pulled them away from their original goal when they registered? [20:21:50] Pine: noted [20:21:53] leila, if only ... but, i will listen to it after. :) [20:22:05] subbu: sounds good. :) [20:22:48] Pine: what kind of goal do you have in mind? [20:23:38] Pine: they received emails and they can ignore those emails if they had specific goals in mind when they joined Wikipedia and while on wiki. Is that what you have in mind? [20:25:08] An example would be User:X joins with the goal of fixing a typo in the article regarding Mars. Then they get presented with a questionnaire (or maybe not if it was sent by email), so did the questionnaire pull them away from fixing the typo in the article in the Mars article? [20:25:34] leila, it's entirely possible that I missed part of the design discussion while I was in a different conversation. [20:26:00] If my question has a faulty premise then I'm fine with the question being ignored. [20:26:49] Pine: got it. We don't know what people's goals are so we can't answer this kind of question easily. Given that it was over email, and in many cases it arrived in their inbox days after they have registered, my hypothesis is that it didn't distract them. [20:27:02] Sounds good. Thank you. :) [20:27:29] np. :) [20:27:46] looks like Pine's question got answered. I won't be asking it in hangouts. [20:27:52] Yes, thanks. [20:34:05] I'll ask a late question but it may take me a minute to formulate. [20:34:56] Is this questionnaire system extendible to encouraging newbies to contact active Wikiprojects that have high levels of interactions with the types of articles that the user is interested in editing? [20:35:08] Pine: ok [20:37:47] Pine you heard it ;) [20:38:13] thank you all! [20:38:15] Thanks. [20:39:19] amazing Showcase, thanks all :)