[15:50:30] o/ [15:58:27] bd808: o/ [15:59:16] bd808: re Technical Advice IRC meetings. The time of these meetings has a conflict which takes away some of your options for hosting the meeting. [15:59:54] bd808: in our case, we will try to help you by picking up one of the timeslots, but I figured I flag this as something you may want to consider fixing if this is a blocker for some to host the session. [16:00:54] bd808: I understand that Research's case is a special one as we only have one engineer at the moment, but we're also very willing to help so I'm not sure what would be the weight for what I said above. ;) [16:15:46] isaacj: there are two emails from Olga. do you want me to answer them or you? just let me know. :) [16:21:40] yeah, was looking at that. you probably should because it feels more on the planning/time commitment side of things and i'm not sure what to promise there [16:21:44] leila: ^^ [16:21:50] thanks!! [16:22:01] isaacj: ok. I'll do it now. [16:22:09] :thumbs up: [16:22:34] isaacj: we want to start in Q4, right? so April 1? [16:22:35] ;0 [16:22:36] ;) [16:23:21] isaacj: and re internal/external surveys: you only want to ask 1 question, correct? if yes, we can run it on QuickSurvey itself (without the need to go to Google Form) [16:24:10] leila: yeah, Q4 makes sense (will get us time to get demographics surveys out). and right now gender seemed to be the only question of interest so keeping it off google forms makes more sense to me [16:25:43] all good [16:27:28] isaacj: is there an other field that is free form text? [16:27:38] is there going to be * [16:27:52] isaacj: I think quicksurvey can't handle that. [16:29:46] isaacj, leila: internal surveys can have multiple choice answers. So if you can formulate the question in such a way that can be answered by one of the options, that's doable. [16:30:35] bmansurov: great. I think we should be fine then. Let's here Dr. isaacj. [16:35:23] leila: oooh. that's difficult. we can probably find a compromise where we include a few more standard options and "other" without free-form text but it's definitely much more inclusive to give people the option to say what they identify as [16:35:52] but i also think that asking them to click through to google forms is to be avoided if we can so probably worth the compromise [16:36:34] and thanks bmansurov. i'm realizing i've only done the external survey so didn't know what options internal had [17:24:03] isaacj: understood and agreed. [17:25:19] isaacj: free form text will be a blocker. let's request a separate help for that once we gain some browny points. :D [17:27:33] leila: agreed [17:30:22] dsaez: I'm a few min late. sorry [17:30:45] ok. np [20:44:21] debt: do you want me to change the Goal Owner in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technology/Annual_Plans/FY2019/CDP3:_Knowledge_Integrity/Goals to myself? [20:45:05] hey there...Sorry - I meant to do that earlier - I'll take care of it! :) [20:45:10] thanks for the reminder, leila :) [20:45:32] debt: ok. I'll wait for you to do that before I enter updates then. [20:45:52] debt: anytime. and thanks for your patience. I'm finally resurrected from mid-term planning and cold. :D [20:48:57] leila: yay for being healthy again! :) The page is updated now, feel free to add the updates! [20:49:06] debt: great. thanks. [20:49:46] :) [21:10:50] debt: I did most of the goal updates for TEC-9 and CDP-3. I have some clarifying questions from folks in Europe and the Easy Coast and will wait until Monday to talk with them before finalizing it. [21:11:49] debt: the main item I flag is Outcome 3 / Output 1 in TEC-9. [21:12:49] leila: cool, thanks! L) [21:12:50] :) [21:15:12] np