[17:02:37] isaacj: re WMCon North America: you can decide whether to do a State of Research or State of Research with a focus on Content Integrity. Given the theme the latter may be more appropriate and within the scope. [17:02:42] isaacj: I'm fine with either. [17:04:09] yeah, because i won't have time to do a full "state of research" justice anyhow, i'd say let's focus on content integrity. there's also some newer work there which means better state for feedback from the community [17:04:30] and just feels more respectful of the conference's theme [17:04:35] as you point out [17:20:16] isaacj I have some slides on citation usage/needed you can recycle if you want :) [17:41:04] miriam_: yes, thanks (that'll fit perfectly)! submission deadline is the 20th but only an abstract needed at that point and then in October after I hear I'll begin pulling together slides [19:12:37] leila: do you have a link to a semi-recent State of Wikimedia Research presentation abstract / description? [19:23:03] * leila reads [19:25:11] isaacj: +1 for dropping the general "State of Research at WMF". I don't have a recent State of WMF Research which I would want to present based on, so: no. But I'm happy to help develop an abstract with you if that helps (for the knowledge integrity theme you'll talk about.) [19:27:31] leila: sounds good. i just sent you a link to my current iteration of the abstract [19:27:59] great. I'll get to it later in my afternoon. I'm about to start the work for the two presentations tomorrow. [19:36:03] :thumbs up: