[02:37:13] Hello everyone [02:53:24] how do I link my account to the Phabricator task for context as instructed on the "How do I work with the Wikimedia community?" of the project information page on outreachy [03:18:58] Hello, I am an outreachy applicant wishing to contribute to the "A system for releasing data dumps from a classifier detecting unsourced sentences in Wikipedia" project! So excited! [03:19:12] is the the correct channel for that project? [03:23:27] hey ggp. You just missed someone interested in T233707 [03:23:27] T233707: A system for releasing data dumps from a classifier detecting unsourced sentences in Wikipedia - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T233707 [03:23:44] They were using the nick "grooveANDrhyme" [03:24:36] I was trying to find the task to answer their question (is the the correct channel for that project?) but they left before I found it :/ [03:25:50] bd808: oh :( thanks for helping though. I just got an email from an applicant, I wonder if it's the same person. [03:26:36] I was assuming this would be the channel to talk about that project but I'll have a chat with Sam and Miriam later today, we should have that explicit in the task [03:27:19] good idea [03:28:19] y'all can use the Zulip server too if you end up finding applicants who struggle with irc [03:28:51] I think Srishti can get you a login there if you don't have one [03:30:46] cool thanks! [09:51:45] Samwalton9: hello! I'd want to use Jupyter notebook to work on task 1 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T234519) primarily to generate a summary of my observations, possibly, using graphs. Would using such a tool be considered as a valid submission? Please advice. [09:52:09] pgadige, Hi! Yes, that should be fine :) [09:52:49] Samwalton9: thank you! [18:53:31] dsaez: I'm thinking about our conversation about the frequency of office hours by Research for the community. [18:54:07] dsaez: I'm swinging back and forth between once a quarter and once a month. given that this will be a trial, I'm leaning towards once a month, so we can assess the value clearly after 6 months. [18:54:15] mgerlach: ^ (for when you're back tomorrow)