[21:06:05] isaacj, still fighting with figshare. Looks like they deleted a bunch of my uploads too -- breaking DOIs :| [21:06:35] Apparently my extraction of scholarly article citations from Wikipedia broke their terms of service :| [21:06:56] I think that was my first ever upload to figshare. [21:07:50] yikes...that's highly problematic and a very weird cascade of actions that they took. motivates us to look into a different platform for hosting these datasets with DOIs [21:10:16] i also don't fully understand why the scholarly article citation would break terms of services but... [21:11:41] Right. Seems totally backwards. Their support response of "just register a new account" seems really bad too. [21:11:56] I tweeted at them and CC'd Dario because they squashed a couple of datasets we worked on together. [21:13:23] \o/ got a response [21:14:31] smart -- dario might have recommendations for alternatives as well. well i'll monitor this item to make sure it doesn't go down as well [21:18:36] I checked my email. I had no notification that anything was disabled/deleted. [21:19:32] Man. I have a ton of datasets missing. Basically the foundation of my open science practice (datasets used in papers) is all gone. [21:21:19] yeah, and they claim they would provide notification ( https://knowledge.figshare.com/articles/item/data-moderation-policy-and-take-down-notice ). we have the scoring team : research meeting next week so maybe something to discuss if we don't cancel that given how many people will be out [21:24:59] Agreed. I'll see if I can talk to someone at figshare in the meantime to see if that can give us some assurances this won't happen again. [21:25:19] I really wonder what terms I could have violated! Maybe they just decided my datasets were too big :D [21:29:37] yeah, assurances would be nice though it doesn't really give me too much confidence. i do my best to back up to analytics as well so maybe will do that with this most recent upload [21:31:59] I just got word back that they disabled my whole account because I referenced the "AOL search" dataset in the documentation. [21:32:04] Of one upload. [21:32:13] Ooof. It's not even the scary AOL dataset [21:40:57] wait...like just mentioning it was enough to trigger that? i understand wanting to prevent reupload of that but that's an incredibly broad filter. sigh. [21:41:26] sounds like they could benefit from some ORES-like services [22:18:17] J-Mo: is https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Identification_of_Unsourced_Statements/API_design_research ready to be called "completed"? I /think/ it is. [22:23:30] leila sure!