[09:13:05] <_joe_>	 jbond42: I was thinking we could add https://github.com/domcleal/puppet-lint-param-docs and use it like we do for the wmf-style checker
[09:13:24] <_joe_>	 so that at least new code is forced to be documented
[09:13:35] <_joe_>	 if you add a parameter and add no docs => -1 from jenkins
[09:13:58] <_joe_>	 re: yesterday's email
[09:15:07] <_joe_>	 lemme comment on the task
[09:21:07] <jbond42>	 _joe_: i like that idea, will this mean that anyone who touches an undocumented class is now responsible for documenting it?
[09:21:58] <_joe_>	 not if we use the same approach as we did for the styleguide check
[09:22:04] <_joe_>	 we only check if there are deltas
[09:22:11] <_joe_>	 so yeah, if you add a parameter to a class
[09:22:17] <_joe_>	 you need to at least document that :)
[09:22:25] <_joe_>	 that parameter, I mean
[09:22:28] <jbond42>	 ok then yes i think its a win
[09:22:49] <moritzm>	 and usually it often guilt-trips people to also fix missing older entries :-)
[09:22:52] <_joe_>	 I'm also pretty sure a lot of our comments do not conform to the puppetdoc style
[09:23:40] <jbond42>	 lol i like it moritzm 
[09:24:06] <jbond42>	 _joe_: no there are manyh styles in use, hjowever to be fair like many things puppet has changed its style guide a few times
[09:24:24] <_joe_>	 yeah I don't think anyone read those
[09:24:34] <_joe_>	 I'm guilty as charged btw
[09:24:53] <_joe_>	 I hate writing docs and it shows in how undisciplined I am with the style
[09:25:46] <jbond42>	 i just fix what vim tells me to fix :)