[08:20:09] cdanis: between Arzhel and me docs updated accordingly. Let us know if you encounter any issue [10:59:31] netbox-dev2001.wikimedia.org-Monthly-1st-Wed-production-netbox and netbox-dev2001.wikimedia.org-Monthly-1st-Wed-production-netbox-postgres backups are failing [10:59:49] is that expected? [11:01:42] with expected I mean that maybe if they are devboxes backups are not important? [11:03:01] jynus: that host was setup yesterday by chaomodus, and it's indeed a netbox host where to test migrations and upgrades where the data should be most of the time imported fresh from a prod dump [11:03:12] actually, I am looking at it [11:03:19] I personally would skip backups entirely [11:03:24] and technically they run successfully [11:03:30] but they don't backup anything [11:03:39] so skipping backups seems the reasonable option [11:03:52] should I create a task? [11:04:20] (for background, I consider 0 byte backups as a failure because normally it means there is a missconfiguration) [11:04:39] I will wait for their input before creating a task [11:04:48] thanks, volans for the info [11:05:44] ack, thanks, yeah it might be that the db is still empty, not sure of the current status as still in the setup phase [11:05:47] I have to review with many service owners the backup policy because probably many backup jobs may not be useful, and there could be others that we are not done [11:06:01] *we are not doing [11:06:02] but I vote for no backups on that host fwiw :) [11:06:19] in many cases a role is reused for test/pasive hosts [11:06:33] and backups should not be done on those hosts in some cases [11:07:10] in general extra backups are not really an issue [11:07:30] but they may uncover other unwanted configuration [11:08:09] I just realized the disabled notifications of netbox-dev2001 [11:09:52] in this case the role is different, but profiles are reused [11:09:54] if that helps [11:10:05] yeah, similar issue [11:10:07] but yeah something similar to disable notifications for backups in general [11:10:12] might be a possible approach [11:10:30] don't worry, it is clearly WIP, so no issue [11:10:48] my job it to worry when we don't have backups, hope you understand 0:-D [13:50:41] volans: worked great, thanks [15:52:45] cdanis: and you'll have to amend it later, we've slightly changed the convention :-) [17:58:54] XioNoX: is there some config knob somewhere for librenms to change what links it adds to the 'Ports' menu? would be nice to have https://librenms.wikimedia.org/iftype/type=transport-tun included there as well [18:10:17] cdanis: maybe [18:10:22] https://docs.librenms.org/Support/Configuration/ [18:10:30] "Enable / disable certain menus from being shown in the WebUI." [18:10:36] but it's not very clear [18:11:02] hmm [18:11:38] unrelated but "You can enable dynamic graphs within the WebUI under Global Settings -> Webui Settings -> Graph Settings." might be interesting too