[13:45:00] <XioNoX>	 jbond42: so if I understand it correctly not all DHCP packets are being MITM equally because of a Junos bug. And it's freaking out ISC-DHCP? But regarless of ISC-DHCP, we shouldn't use vlan-id if it's not consistent?
[13:46:27] <jbond42>	 XioNoX: looks like all the packets are being mitm however juniper is altering them in different ways.  but yes it seems that using vlan-name worked previoulsy so that seems the best option
[13:47:12] <XioNoX>	 jbond42: +1 then, do you want to push the change or should I?
[13:47:24] <jbond42>	 XioNoX: i can do it thanks
[13:47:42] <XioNoX>	 ok, let me know if you need help
[13:47:49] <jbond42>	 will do thanks :)
[13:47:52] <XioNoX>	 and good catch :)
[13:47:52] <volans>	 weird :/
[13:47:57] <volans>	 thanks for testing it
[13:48:11] <volans>	 you'll need to change 1020 in the file for sretest1002 with the vlan name
[13:48:18] <jbond42>	 yes its very strange smells like a bug in juniper to me
[13:48:20] <XioNoX>	 someone wants to open a JTAC case? (I don't) :)
[13:48:29] <jbond42>	 volans: yes i have allready done that manually
[13:48:34] <volans>	 ack, thx
[13:48:42] <jbond42>	 XioNoX: not really :P
[17:37:09] <paravoid>	 do we have CapEx/OpEx requests from this team?
[17:37:14] <paravoid>	 ganeti, for example? moritzm ^
[17:37:42] <paravoid>	 (we do have the network capex/opex, obviously - I think XioNoX you're already working on it, right?)
[17:38:22] <XioNoX>	 of course
[17:40:43] <paravoid>	 :)
[17:41:47] <volans>	 I guess the cumin unprivileged can stay as a VMs even in its final setup (cc moritzm )
[17:42:05] <volans>	 but in case not those would be 2 minimal hardware hosts
[18:12:58] <moritzm>	 yeah, I'm looking into ganeti capex
[18:14:57] <moritzm>	 cuminunpriv needs some further consideration/discussion, there are pros and cons