[06:48:55] what's Mjolnir? [06:50:16] ah, https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Search/MLR_Pipeline [08:05:52] XioNoX: ping me if you need more context on mjolnir, anything wrong that I should know about? [08:06:33] gehel: ok! I was looking at who to contact for https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T225904 [08:07:16] that would be me! I'll have a look [08:54:25] onimisionipe: re:prospector issues... it's an issue due to some latest release within the pylint packages, see https://github.com/PyCQA/prospector/issues/335 [08:56:48] we've basically 3 options: 1) force prospector version to 1.1.6.2; 2) bypass CI V-2 when only prospector is failing for the next few days until a fix is out; 3) temporarily disable pylint check in prospector.yaml [08:56:53] cc gehel ^^^ [09:05:17] hmm [09:05:40] I think option 1 is better [09:06:33] :) https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/software/spicerack/+/517384 [09:06:36] just sent [09:06:42] for spicerack, I'll send one for cookbooks too [09:06:55] as I'll be out most of the week [09:14:22] volans: thanks for the check! [11:42:17] Hi al, what is the default licence to use for new code re: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/514459/3/modules/icinga/files/icinga_status.py#2 [11:43:38] so jbond42 there's no default license for the puppet repo because of reasons T67270 [11:43:38] T67270: Default license for operations/puppet - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T67270 [11:44:06] but looks like past leaning was towards apache2 license [11:44:56] thanks cdanis, reading that link now [11:48:50] AIUI, authors should feel free to put the usual "this is licensed under apache-2.0" boilerplate at the top of that file (someone please correct me if this is misguided) [11:56:15] if you add a completely new file (and it meets the complexity requirements to be copyrightable), that's perfectly fine [11:56:19] cdanis: i think that sounds about right, from the ticket it seems the prefrence is apache, i think things have just stalledtrying to get retrospective permission to add this licence to current code [11:56:30] that task is about slapping a general license to our puppet.git at large [11:56:31] moritzm: cheers [11:56:41] yes, that's all accurate AIUI [11:56:50] sorry, tried to express all that but I'm still waking up [11:57:09] and that is a totally different beast, as it would need to track down all previous commiters for compliance (and if they don't agree, rewrite/remove it) [11:57:31] OpenSSL still isn't 100% done with their relicense effort :-)