[08:19:30] <jynus>	 ipv6 issues on eqsin?
[08:26:11] <vgutierrez>	 looks like it
[08:27:15] <godog>	 mr Younsi reached out to equinix some hours ago for that fwiw
[08:48:26] <elukey>	 if anybody wants to review/comment https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/operations/puppet/+/522073/ (global ldap ro endpoint in hiera)
[08:48:44] <elukey>	 akosiaris: o/ - whenever you have time can you review --^ ?
[08:59:14] * volans name bikeshedding
[09:00:01] <elukey>	 as long as we agree on a name, I am ok :D
[09:00:16] <volans>	 server seems a bit redundant, maybe ldap: {readonly: foo, readwrite: bar}? I'm assuming that we plan to have readwrite too
[09:00:27] <volans>	 if not ldap: foo might even be enough :D
[09:09:09] <elukey>	 yes but at the same time it identifies what readonly is, namely a target server
[09:09:14] <elukey>	 ldap is very generic
[09:09:55] <elukey>	 fixed the typo :)
[09:10:48] <volans>	 :D
[09:11:10] <volans>	 no strong opinions, as it is now it's already ok for me, and you have 2 +1s ;)
[09:14:25] <elukey>	 all right thanks :)
[09:34:03] <elukey>	 follow up question - ldap::config::labs seems to be used in a lot of places, for example to get proxyagent and pass
[09:34:35] <elukey>	 should we add all the info to the new ldap hiera config too and decouple the labs hiera config with the prod one?
[09:34:44] <elukey>	 (maybe I am missing something, I am super ignorant about ldap)
[09:36:20] <elukey>	 ah no wait I can see also $passwords::ldap::production::proxypass etc..
[09:36:33] <elukey>	 there is a mixture of things in puppet :D
[09:37:59] <volans>	 ofc :D
[22:33:14] <jaufrecht>	 when was the SRE team broken out into sub-teams?
[22:42:14] <legoktm>	 two all-hands ago?
[22:43:09] <jaufrecht>	 do the sub-teams all have their weekly meetings on Mondays, before the all-SRE meeting?
[22:49:45] <paravoid>	 jaufrecht: the answer to the second question is no, I think actually none of the subteams have their weekly on Mondays
[22:49:59] <paravoid>	 I think service ops has two though? so maybe one of them is before? dunno
[22:50:14] <paravoid>	 the answer to the first question is a bit trickier
[22:50:26] <paravoid>	 TechOps had subteams before it got renamed to SRE
[22:50:34] <paravoid>	 that goes back... years ago
[22:50:47] <apergos>	 we have one on monday just before the big team meeting, and one on thursday
[22:51:36] <paravoid>	 the SRE name and the new structure became effective on Jan 1st, 2018
[22:54:52] <paravoid>	 jaufrecht: why are you asking? :)
[22:55:07] <paravoid>	 depending on the question the answer may differ :)
[23:33:11] <chaomodus>	 if someone could rubberstamp +1 this that'd be awesome https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/522562
[23:59:57] <XioNoX>	 chaomodus: why is accounting check_interval: null ?