[00:23:37] <jaufrecht>	 if backlog refers to not-Done work, what's the term to refer to all stories, Done and not Done?
[01:10:10] <meeple27>	 can't think of a term
[18:09:27] <awjr>	 meeple27: do you have a few minutes for a quick meeting to discuss the wmf strategy stuff?
[18:09:48] <meeple27>	 awjr: yup. next mtg is in 21
[18:09:57] <meeple27>	 do you want to hang me out?
[18:10:02] <awjr>	 lol
[18:10:11] <awjr>	 im afraid to say yes to that
[18:11:18] <awjr>	 meeple27: trying to hangout you now
[18:11:25] <awjr>	 there's just no good way to say it.
[18:11:48] <meeple27>	 :P
[18:40:38] <kristenlans>	 meeple27: is "Standup - Portal Team" at all negotiable on Thursday 19 Nov at 11:15?
[18:41:00] <kristenlans>	 meeple27: trying to wrangle a prunign discussion
[18:41:18] <meeple27>	 kristenlans: yes, all my standups and planning/grooming meetings are negotiable
[18:41:28] <meeple27>	 well, almost all. rare exceptions in specific weeks
[18:41:57] <kristenlans>	 OK cool. I am going to go ahead and schedule out that time. Lemme know if we need to reconsider.
[18:44:59] <meeple27>	 thanks
[18:45:40] <meeple27>	 awjr or others: any idea why, when I am a member of a google group, that group is not available as an autocomplete in the To field when I create an email?
[18:46:47] <meeple27>	 hm. never mind, I guess. I can get there the other way around, by creating a "new topic" from inside the group.
[18:46:57] <meeple27>	 hopefully eventually the group will get into my contacts list
[18:47:24] <awjr>	 huh meeple27 it should autocomplete, perhaps a glitch in the system
[18:47:39] <meeple27>	 a glitch in a google system? Impossible!
[18:49:48] <meeple27>	 awjr: I just sent the message to platypi. please confirm if/when you got it
[18:54:58] <awjr>	 meeple27: got it
[18:55:02] <awjr>	 i mean, i have received it
[19:34:19] <meeple27>	 thanks awjr
[20:13:17] <marxarelli>	 hey TPG, i am grateful for you :)
[20:14:03] <awjr>	 :D
[20:14:10] <awjr>	 thanks marxarelli , we are grateful for you toow :)
[20:14:15] <marxarelli>	 especially meeple27 who is bringing civility to strategy discussions
[20:14:15] <awjr>	 too, also
[20:14:36] <awjr>	 :D
[20:14:52] <marxarelli>	 and ggellerman because she made an awesome onboarding workboard yesterday
[20:15:04] <marxarelli>	 and awjr because you're fun to drink with
[20:15:20] <marxarelli>	 and kristen|afk because ... Annecy Trouts!
[20:18:36] <awjr>	 :D:D
[20:22:51] <kristenlans>	 thanks for the love marxarelli!
[20:26:59] <marxarelli>	 blame ggellerman. :) she said something nice to me and it reminded me how (extra) important it is to acknowledge each other during such times of disillusionment
[20:31:48] <kristenlans>	 awjr i think I'm in the hangout?
[20:31:49] <meeple27>	 thanks marxarelli!
[20:32:07] <kristenlans>	 awjr i see you
[20:58:39] <dstrine>	 jaufrecht:  I recently heard a different pronunciation of phlogiston: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5UhZbRS5rE
[20:59:29] <dstrine>	 the youtube link is an example. I heard a college professor pronounce it the same way.
[21:00:14] <jaufrecht>	 hmm
[21:01:59] <dstrine>	 I'm listening the the great courses "History of Science". It's pretty interesting. I was surprised to hear this term. It didn't know it had been so popular. 
[21:34:05] <kristenlans>	 I do not accept any pronunciations of phlogiston other than Joel's.
[21:40:40] <meeple27>	 flow-giston does make more sens than flaw-giston
[21:40:58] <meeple27>	 not radically different from what we have been saying...just change the o