[18:21:31] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-2017Q1-Roll-Out-Engagement-Survey, 07Epic: [EPIC] Roll out Light Engagement survey - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T139549#2537465 (10ggellerman) [18:30:18] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-2017Q1-Roll-Out-Engagement-Survey, 07Epic: Final editing of the Light Engagement survey to prepare for Round 1 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T142512#2537485 (10ggellerman) [18:30:22] ggellerman: since I think you're working with legal and phab, you should be aware of a conversation in the staff channel about phab and NDA's [18:30:43] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-2017Q1-Roll-Out-Engagement-Survey, 07Epic: [EPIC] Roll out Light Engagement survey - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T139549#2435674 (10ggellerman) [18:37:20] ggellerman: Having tasks listed in the epic task description is fine, but I don't like *also* having them have checkboxes. Can I remove the checkboxes? [18:38:47] meeple27: I was not author of the original ticket. I think that was @jaufrecht [18:39:05] ggellerman: understood. But are you ok with me removing them? [18:40:24] meeple27: I think that it would be fine to remove them. I see the value in capturing actions at the ticket rather than checkbox level. And using ticket numbers as checkboxes exposes some not delightful Phab UX issues [18:40:46] cool. i'll remove them. [18:41:03] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-2017Q1-Roll-Out-Engagement-Survey, 07Epic: [EPIC] Roll out Light Engagement survey - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T139549#2537534 (10ksmith) [18:41:28] i suspect it might have been checkboxes+non-task text, and then when the text was converted to tasks, the checkboxes remained instead of being removed [18:41:36] anyway, they're gone now [18:41:39] thanks [19:51:50] 06Team-Practices, 10Phlogiston (Technical Debt), 15User-JAufrecht: Display report settings in a useful way on report page - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T142171#2537874 (10JAufrecht) 05Open>03Resolved [20:16:59] ggellerman: that NDA thing I mentioned became: T142516, in case you want to subscribe [20:16:59] T142516: Custom task form for #WMF-NDA - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T142516 [20:20:51] meeple27: thanks! looks like most of the fields in it are hidden [20:22:13] ggellerman: right. this form would be used to create a new task with NDA status, so i assume those are the fields that would be hidden to the public [20:22:45] (note that I didn't follow the conversation in great detail, so that's just my interpretation based on limited information and context) [20:23:12] meeple27: thanks for sharing! [21:25:33] 06Team-Practices, 06Community-Liaisons, 06Community-Tech, 06Developer-Relations, and 3 others: How to address the long tail of low priority tasks in active projects - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78639#2538299 (10Danny_B) [21:26:09] 06Team-Practices, 06Developer-Relations, 10Gerrit, 05Gerrit-Migration: When uploading a new patch, reviewers should be added automatically - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T91190#2538304 (10Danny_B) [21:37:49] meeple27: Verdana puts bars on top and bottom of uppercase I [21:38:12] which is one of the reasons i like verdana :) that and i hate serifs [21:38:19] but that may also be a product of my pixelated age [21:40:25] so, i have my browser default sans-serif font set to verdana. in irccloud, i have it set to use 'sans-serif' for the font, but it appears to be using what I think it arial :-/ [21:43:32] actually not arial; whatever the font is puts a little curvey thing at the bottom of the lowercase l [21:43:54] moral of the story: fonts are a pain in the ass; wingdings and/or comic sans forever! [21:54:04] * kristenlans chants "comic sans! comic sans!" [21:59:38] 👍 [22:09:39] awjr: Ah. My guess is that I probably don't have "real" verdana installed, so when I pick "verdana" from the list, I'm actually getting ubuntu or some other substitute [22:10:10] oh right! silly fonts [22:17:57] I just tried a free verdana replacement font called veranda, but it lacks the I serifs. False advertising! [22:21:19] how could microsoft be the only people on the planet smart enough to put serifs on the capital I?