[18:09:51] ggellerman: jaufrecht meeple27 did you guys tea last week? [18:10:09] nope [18:31:21] nataliaharateh: I'm sorry I just sent you 50 emails [18:33:06] let me know if you feel any meetings need rescheduling, especially those that fall on your Friday night [18:52:17] should I wipe the tea time voting from last week so we can start over? [19:10:30] I think all of them are good maxbinder [19:10:41] accepted [19:16:04] jaufrecht: sounds good to me [19:18:13] jaufrecht: meeple27 +1 tea wipe [19:23:56] done [20:03:24] ggellerman: meeple27 abbey provided some feedback on the light engagement survey for current engagements. are we still in an acceptable time window to send out the survey to design folks? if so, i'll incorporate her feedback now [20:05:21] awjr: you could send it "shortly" and still close on the 28th, or you could just do your own thing and open and close it on a schedule that works for you [20:05:59] meeple27: ok, i should be able to get this out today if you and ggellerman are on board [20:06:03] ggellerman and I don't think it necessarily has to fit into the "pilot 2 wave b" grouping. Our intention moving forward is that anyone will be able to run one of the surveys when they think it will be valuable [20:06:14] ok makes sense [20:06:30] so this would be kind of pilot 3 or pilot 2b, which is piloting the non-batched surveys more intentionally [20:07:06] just make a copy of the template, and include the engagement name in the filename and also the form title, before sending [20:21:56] meeple27: awjr: if current round 2 wave B is end of pilot, I think that other ones could be one-offs sent along the lines of what will go into our Operating Procedure (note lack of S), yes? [20:23:28] yup, it's all just semantics at this point. I do want to include the "ongoing" idea as something we learned from wave b, but beyond that, I don't think it really matters whether it's part of the pilot, or considered to be post-pilot [20:23:54] (aside from the important fact that if it's post-pilot, ggellerman doesn't have to be considered its shepherd :) ) [20:24:55] okidoke [20:25:03] i've sent out the updated ongoing version of the survey to the design folks [20:25:27] ggellerman: i realized right when i hit send that you are on the list i was including as 'people in design' because of your work with them, feel free to fill it out if you like :p [20:26:03] unshepherding me sounds good, meeple27: and I will continue being what KL called, "The Light Engagement Lemur" :) [20:26:14] awjr: will be on the lookout for it [20:31:57] lol [20:48:39] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-Essential-Functions: Mock up different approaches to improve TPG backlog - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T146314#2660377 (10JAufrecht) p:05Triage>03Normal [21:38:16] 06Team-Practices: Add TPG team norm about calendar sanity - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T146424#2660597 (10ksmith) [21:51:39] 06Team-Practices: Add TPG team norm about Tea Time topic clarity - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T146427#2660676 (10ksmith) [22:16:33] 06Team-Practices: Write up quick summaries of recent light engagement surveys related to my work - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T146428#2660759 (10ksmith) [22:31:46] meeple27: thanks for being ACTION!wolf today [22:32:07] maxbinder: my emojis aren't working again! [22:39:40] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-Essential-Functions: Develop TPG definition of "embedded" - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T146429#2660821 (10ggellerman) [22:40:32] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-Essential-Functions: Develop TPG definition of "embedded" - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T146429#2660834 (10ggellerman) @KLans_WMF and I are meeting 2016-10-14 to kickoff the discussion [23:09:40] 👺 👱 [23:09:44] the names are better than the graphics [23:09:48] kristenlans: ⌘+P, then choose paper size, then select B&W......er, wait, wrong SOP [23:09:58] 🐺 [23:29:13] ggellerman: "Promoteren... What's your price for flight?..." (sung to the tune of "Sister Christian") [23:30:19] meeple27: LOLZ :) you make me glad that I made that typo :)