[00:36:11] meeple27: I have tried booking my few available large blocks of time as FOCUS! I think that my method differs from your "break" method but otherwise sounds similar [17:45:37] kristenlans: et al might be 15 min late to work review [17:45:49] maxbinder: m'kay [18:25:03] ggellerman_: Cool, thanks. It solves a different problem, but is worth capturing [18:34:32] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-Essential-Functions, 07Epic, 10TPG-Epics (Team Practices Group Coaching Clinic), 10Wikimedia-Developer-Summit (2017): Team Practices Group Coaching Clinic - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T148068#2953699 (10JAufrecht) [18:35:13] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-FY2016-17-Q2-LE-Metrics, 07Category, 07Epic, and 2 others: [EPIC] Establish metrics for Light Engagements - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T147354#2953705 (10JAufrecht) [18:35:34] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-Essential-Functions, 07Epic, 10TPG-Epics (Team Practices Group Coaching Clinic), 10Wikimedia-Developer-Summit (2017): Team Practices Group Coaching Clinic - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T148068#2713955 (10JAufrecht) [18:35:45] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-Essential-Functions, 07Epic, 10TPG-Epics (Team Practices Group Coaching Clinic), 10Wikimedia-Developer-Summit (2017): Team Practices Group Coaching Clinic - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T148068#2953710 (10KLans_WMF) [18:36:37] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-Essential-Functions: Definition of "embedded" - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151232#2953713 (10JAufrecht) [18:44:22] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-Essential-Functions: Definition of "embedded" - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151232#2953750 (10JAufrecht) [18:52:56] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-FY2016-17-Q2-LE-Metrics, 07Category, 07Epic, and 2 others: [EPIC] Establish metrics for Light Engagements - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T147354#2953781 (10JAufrecht) 05Open>03Resolved [18:58:00] @maxbinder think you'll make it? [18:58:54] What room? Not using the room on my calendar [18:59:16] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-Essential-Functions, 07Epic, 10TPG-Epics (Team Practices Group Coaching Clinic), 10Wikimedia-Developer-Summit (2017): Team Practices Group Coaching Clinic - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T148068#2953824 (10JAufrecht) [18:59:55] 06Team-Practices, 10TPG-Essential-Functions: TPG to discuss State of the CSAT - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T153371#2953825 (10NHarateh_WMF) a:05ggellerman>03NHarateh_WMF [19:00:05] @maxbinder you're the only in-office (Joel had to leave earlier) [19:44:16] jaufrecht: i need to reschedule the meeting you and i have tomorrow - can you please move it to some time next week? [19:45:36] okay [20:01:17] jaufrecht: much as I love the idea from meeple27: to give nicknames to the quadrants, I am wondering if we could go with idea from kristenlans: in doc to not "get too hung up on nicknames, we can work with LT deep, ST light, etc. for now." [20:02:07] I see the case either way. I'm neutral. [20:02:08] jaufrecht: especially given how brain-addled we were trying to come up with something better than "chronic" [20:02:17] ggellerman_: I am inclined to agree, as long as we agree on the 4 non-pithy identifiers [20:02:29] maybe give the rest of the team one stab at it and then enforce a strict deadline [20:03:28] meeple27: methinks that some are already great. What I fear is coming up with the deep/LT one via Comment Party [20:04:39] meeple27: I definitely want the nicknames! And I already like "ephemeral" alot :) [20:05:30] jaufrecht: and then adopt best suggestion delivered by deadline? [20:06:16] at the deadline, if we don't have consensus on nicknames, fall back to "LT Deep" etc with, say, a 1-month cooling-off period before nicknames suggestions are again entertained. [20:07:37] jaufrecht: So it would be LT Deep, ST Deep, LT Light, and ST Light? I still find the recycling of "light" to be confusing, and doubly so with LT also in use. But I don't think I would veto if that's the best we can do [20:13:07] thanks jaufrecht [20:33:43] jaufrecht: when should deadline be? meeple27: can you live with risk that we potentially revert to use of "light" if we end up having to invoke 1-month cooling-off period ? [20:33:56] deadline should be next staff meeting [21:44:35] awjr: ermagerd Namely so much better [21:45:11] Haha though tI did just get this message: "Hi Kristen, [21:45:11] You has updated their time off request." [21:45:18] Thanks you! [21:54:48] jaufrecht: meeple27: should I send a [DECISION-ish ] email that the plan is commitment to nicknaming, deadline for suggestion & consensus is Monday, then 1 month cooling off period if no consensus? [21:55:04] sounds good.