[19:50:14] <meeple27>	 ggellerman_: re: spam: Doh!
[19:50:45] <meeple27>	 (and in other news) I am not liking the new gcal "find a time". Scrolling horizontally without a mouse is pretty painful :(
[20:20:30] <ggellerman_>	 meeple27: I am considering filtering the spam
[20:21:43] <meeple27>	 ggellerman_: yeah, either he didn't believe what I said, or he doesn't realize we're both at the same org. Neither excuse demonstrates great intelligence or judgment.
[20:40:48] <ggellerman_>	 meeple27: I think that these people are compensated for being relentless.
[20:59:11] <maxbinder>	 jaufrecht: need about ten min 
[21:03:36] <jaufrecht>	 🙉
[23:03:53] <jaufrecht>	 maxbinder: I wonder if we should also mock up three or four examples of what different categories of Engagement-as-task look like
[23:04:23] <jaufrecht>	 example 1: almost none.  Intake and other TPG-centric work is tasks, nothing else is.
[23:04:48] <jaufrecht>	 example 2: scope of work.  E.g., "Attend standups" and "help with offsites"
[23:06:24] <jaufrecht>	 example 3: actual tasks.  "Make an agenda for Feb offsite", "attend Feb offsite"
[23:20:35] <jaufrecht>	 maxbinder: first draft is ready for your attention: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G7FkrIfqhhmqSxaRLf3RcJlgSGb7zlpBco58iqzO-II/edit#
[23:37:05] <maxbinder>	 jaufrecht: I think that is out-of-scope for now, at least until after we get some feedback from TPG, tempting as it might be
[23:38:20] <jaufrecht>	 I'm wondering if it would be helpful to include something on this topic early, to focus and clarify exactly what we think is ass open question